My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
09-27-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2021 1:35:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2021 1:35:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 5 <br /> With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. <br /> D. Planning Case 20-022 — Zoning Code Amendment — Chapter 13 — Section <br /> 1325.07, Subd. 6A—Keeping of Chickens <br /> Senior Planner Jagoe stated starting in 2020, the City Council began discussions on ordinance <br /> language with regards to the keeping of chickens in Arden Hills. A survey was conducted in <br /> November 2020 to garner input from residents on the relaxation of standards for the keeping of <br /> chickens. Those survey results were presented to the City Council at a work session in January. <br /> Staff was provided guidance on general parameters for consideration of a proposed chickens <br /> ordinance. That draft language was reviewed by the City Council at two work sessions on July <br /> 12th and July 26th, 2021. <br /> Senior Planner Jagoe reported in preparing the draft ordinance language, the City deferred to the <br /> document that is used by a number of adjacent communities titled "Recommendations for <br /> Municipal Regulation of Urban Chickens". This guide was the basis for development of ordinance <br /> standards and best practices for licensing requirements. Similar to the Cities of Stillwater and <br /> Falcon Heights, the proposed language includes a requirement that a resident who intends to keep <br /> chickens shall have read the document outlining best care practices. At the July 26th special work <br /> session, Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission <br /> in September for the first review and to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the <br /> keeping of chickens. Staff discussed the Ordinance amendments in further detail and requested <br /> the Council hold a Public Hearing. <br /> Mayor Grant suggested the language within Subd. 6, Item D be reconsidered to address both <br /> single and double car detached garages. <br /> Councilmember McClung commented on the email he received from a property owner in the <br /> southwestern end of the City. He explained he supported keeping coop and detached structures <br /> under the 728 square feet. <br /> Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br /> Mike Loosbrock, 4535 Lakeshore Place, discussed the proposed Ordinance amendments. He <br /> noted he and his wife did not make the Tuesday, September 8 Planning Commission meeting <br /> because it was the first day of school. He addressed the number of chickens that would be <br /> allowed. He noted chickens were a flock animal and he believed three chickens was too low of a <br /> number. He indicated the number of birds also assisted in keeping the birds warm during the <br /> winter months. He commented further on how egg production ebbs and flows during the winter <br /> months and with only three birds this would not provide very many eggs. He encouraged the City <br /> to reconsider having a maximum of eight birds. He proposed the language for the coop size be set <br /> with a minimum per bird (four square feet). He discussed the proposed temperature requirements <br /> and stated they were not practical. He noted chickens were cold hardy animals and noted <br /> supplemental heat was only needed to keep the eggs from freezing. He commented on how <br /> important it was to properly ventilate the coops, especially in the winter months. He believed it <br /> was onerous to require neighbor consent, especially given the strict rules that were in place for the <br /> keeping of chickens. He discussed the screening requirements and noted some neighbors may <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.