My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-21 Planning Commission
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2021
>
06-09-21 Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2021 3:28:01 PM
Creation date
10/28/2021 3:25:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 5, 2021 14 <br /> <br />1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning <br />Code of the City Code. <br />2. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to permit accessory storage sheds within the <br />required structure setback from the ordinary high water level of up to 100 square feet in <br />size and 8 feet in height. <br />3. Amendments to the Shoreland Regulations require approval from the Minnesota DNR. <br />4. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by <br />the City Council <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier recommended approval of Planning Case 21-008 for a Zoning <br />Code Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to permit accessory storage sheds <br />of up to 100 square feet in size and 8 feet in height within the required structure setback from the <br />ordinary high water level as presented in the May 5, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on <br />this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund asked why the City wouldn’t want to model its Shoreland Ordinance <br />based off of neighboring cities, specifically Shoreview. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reported it was her understanding there was some review of other <br />ordinances. She noted the language that was used in this Ordinance was similar to the City of <br />Roseville. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he was anticipating this code change, but questioned if 100 square <br />feet was adequate. He questioned why the City Council landed on this number. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jeffreys commented on the inconsistences between the shoreland regulations #1 <br />and #5. She questioned how the Commission should address this concern. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reported the Commission could set a minimum setback of 10 feet <br />or the Commission could eliminate this language altogether. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jeffreys recommended Shoreland Regulation #5 be eliminated. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums stated it was nice to see the Council was working to amend the Shoreland <br />Ordinance. He indicated he supported the removal of Regulation #5. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 8:59 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.