My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-21 Planning Commission
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2021
>
06-09-21 Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2021 3:28:01 PM
Creation date
10/28/2021 3:25:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 5, 2021 3 <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Bemis reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jeffreys questioned if there were any other garages that would have a garage 10 <br />feet or closer to the street. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Bemis explained she was uncertain if there were any homes in this <br />neighborhood that had garages closer than seven feet to the street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber reported the garage would be 27 feet from the street, seven feet from the <br />right of way. He indicated he supported the proposed request and believed this was an <br />appropriate use of the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund indicated he supported the proposed garage location. He commented <br />the red pines are great for screening, but he feared in 20 to 30 years all screening would be lost <br />and the garage would be visible from the street in the future. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums asked if previous variances have been approved for garages in this neighborhood. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Bemis reported there have been three subdivision requests and one setback <br />variance that have been requested in this neighborhood. She explained the variance and two of <br />the subdivision requests were approved. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums discussed the location of the proposed driveway noting it was getting closer to the <br />property line. He questioned if this was another concern the Commission should be addressing. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Bemis stated the width of the driveway at the road would not be changing <br />and therefore the driveway would be conforming. She indicated staff did not have any concerns <br />with the proposed driveway. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums asked if the new driveway would match the existing concrete driveway. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Bemis deferred this question to the applicant. <br /> <br />Robert Kunze, 4073 Valentine Court, explained he had every intention of matching the <br />driveway materials. He stated for the record that the red pines on the plans have been replaced <br />with arborvitaes, hemlocks and catalpa yews. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the meeting for public comment at this time. There were no comments <br />from the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.