Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />ft. of floor area, whichever is greater. The Applicant had shown a floor area of 212,500 square <br />feet and that would require 212 parking stalls. In October 2020, the approved plans depicted 363 <br />parking spaces and the proposed uses required 362 stalls. As part of the October review, the <br />Applicant had noted the possibility of constructing the expanded parking area which would add <br />198 stalls. In total, the site would have 561 parking stalls. <br /> <br />For Site Plan Review, the Applicant was asked to provide updated parking calculations based on <br />their leased tenant and prospective tenant floor area breakdown of uses within the building. The <br />PUD approval had calculated the required parking spaces based on a spec building of 85% <br />warehouse area and 15% office space. However, that ratio of parking spaces necessary under the <br />code may have changed as a result of their prospective tenant occupancy. Staff has requested <br />this information on several occasions and has not yet received any additional data to update the <br />City Council. It was indicated that the new tenant’s use would be considered lab-use, and the <br />parking space calculation for warehouse area or lab space would fall under the same category as <br />“Other Business and Industry” uses. Based on the Applicants general explanation at the <br />Planning Commission meeting on tenant uses staff believes the following two off-street parking <br />categories would still be applicable and the parking calculation does not change for either <br />warehouse or lab: <br />• Business and Industry – 1 for each employee on major shift plus 1 for each vehicle used <br />in conducting the business or 1 for each 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area, whichever is greater <br /> Note: Staff requested updated parking detail to include both floor area and <br />employee count by tenant in order to verify which equation is greater. <br />• Business and Professional Office – 1 for each 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area <br /> <br />B. Parking Setbacks – Flexibility Shown <br />The GB district requires a 50 foot setback for parking areas from public streets and ROW. As <br />part of the platting process when the property was developed, the Applicant was required to <br />dedicate ROW along Gateway Boulevard. The 2020 original request was for a 30 foot parking <br />lot setback and due to ROW dedication this was modified to requesting a 20 foot setback to the <br />parking area on the north side of the subject parcel. Under the PUD, flexibility was approved for <br />a 20 foot setback from Gateway Boulevard for the main parking area reviewed along with the <br />building design. <br /> <br />The Applicant has shown a 49.4 foot setback from the west property line facing 35W and an 18.2 <br />foot setback from the north property line facing Gateway Boulevard ROW (Note: updated site <br />plan identifies a setback of 28.2 feet, but this includes 10 feet of ROW). The proposed parking <br />lot expansion aligns with the placement of the previously approved parking areas along Gateway <br />Boulevard. It was noted during the PUD review that the proposed parking areas are located <br />approximately 50 feet from the back of curb of Gateway Boulevard. Additionally, that several <br />properties along Round Lake Road and Gateway Boulevard have similar or greater reduction in <br />parking lot setbacks. <br /> <br />The Applicant was under the belief that the PUD approval for the parking lot setback flexibility <br />was granted for the full width/length of the property abutting Gateway Boulevard (i.e. including <br />the “future” parking lot expansion). They are seeking City Council clarification as to whether or <br />not the 20 foot parking setback flexibility was granted inclusive of the “future parking area”. For <br />this application, Site Plan Review is limited in approval of plans prepared in accordance with