My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-20-21-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
12-20-21-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 1:01:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2021 12:57:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />[DRAFT] Intersection Control Evaluation SRF Consulting Group, Inc. <br />County Road E at Snelling Ave N (CR 76) 13 November 30, 2021 <br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br />The following intersection control evaluation (ICE) conclusions and recommendations are provided <br />for the County Road E and Snelling Avenue N intersection in Arden Hills, Ramsey County, <br />Minnesota: <br />· Warrants Analysis <br />The results of the signal warrant analysis indicate that Warrant 1A, Warrant 2, Warrant 3B, and <br />the all-way stop warrant are expected to be met under Opening Year 2023 conditions and continue <br />to be met under Forecast Year 2043 volumes, along with Warrant 1C. A signal or all-way stop <br />being warranted is also justification that a roundabout is “warranted.” <br />· Operations Analysis <br />Results of the operational analysis indicate that the all-way stop control alternative is expected to <br />perform at an overall LOS D with a worst approach at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour under <br />Forecast Year 2043 traffic volumes and existing lane configurations. The traffic signal alternative <br />is expected to perform at an overall LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, and the <br />roundabout is expected to perform at overall LOS A under Forecast Year 2043 traffic volumes <br />and proposed lane configurations. <br />Bethel College and Mounds View High School (MVHS) are in the vicinity of the study intersection, <br />which can result in sharp traffic peaks due to the release of students. The all-way stop control <br />alternative does not accommodate these peaks in traffic volumes as well as a traffic signal or <br />roundabout would. <br />· Safety Analysis <br />Based on the results of the crash analysis, all three alternatives are anticipated to have a similar <br />number of crashes per year. Although, serious injury and fatal crashes are not currently a concern <br />at the study intersection based on observed crashes, roundabout control is likely to have the fewest <br />number of serious injury and fatal crashes per year based on the speeds and angles of the conflicts. <br />· Planning-Level Cost Analysis <br />A traffic signal or roundabout would require capital costs to construct. Traffic signals typically <br />have higher operation and maintenance costs because of the electricity required to operate the <br />signal and routine maintenance required to keep the signal in operation. Operation and <br />maintenance costs associated with a roundabout can vary depending on the amount of <br />illumination required or landscaping alternatives used for the center island. A roundabout is <br />anticipated have a higher construction cost ranging between $1,200,000 and $1,500,00 compared <br />to $300,000 and $400,000 for a traffic signal. <br />· Right-of-Way Considerations <br />The roundabout control, as currently designed, is not expected to require additional right-of-way, <br />and may only require temporary easements during the construction phase. A traffic signal is also <br />anticipated to not require additional right-of-way. The existing business in the northeast quadrant
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.