Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> <br />Q6: Do you have any ideas that would improve this alternative or other <br />alternatives that would meet the project goals? <br />A number of themes emerged across the 21 written responses, each identified and summarized <br />below. <br />Bike/Pedestrian Movement Traffic Signal <br />6 Comments 4 comments <br />• Concern about safety of bikes/pedestrians using <br />the roundabout <br />• Questions about Bike/Ped conflicts with fast <br />moving vehicles <br />• Questions about sight distance, right of way, and <br />yielding <br />• A signal would maintain the current footprint <br />and mirror the traffic control for other CR E <br />intersections <br />• Traffic Signal identified as a preferred option <br />over a roundabout <br />Other Alternatives/No <br />Change/Pavement Project Cost <br />4 Comments 3 Comments <br />• The current intersection is safe and doesn’t have <br />many crashes <br />• A roundabout is a dangerous solution <br />• No changes needed other than pavement <br />rehabilitation <br />• A lower cost option should be considered <br />based on the need <br />• Comments regarding overall cost, purpose <br />and need <br />Intersection Geometry 4-Way Intersection <br />2 comments 2 Comments <br />• Hills and topography within the area are <br />concerning, in winter cars slide through the <br />intersection <br />• A 4-way stop is the best option, less cost <br />Surrounding Network Roundabout <br />1 Comment 1 Comment <br />• Comments regarding circulation patterns and <br />traffic control in the surrounding area • A roundabout is the best solution <br />Safety Considerations Speed Control <br />1 Comment 1 Comment <br />• Places to pull over for emergency vehicle access • Speed enforcement is needed <br />Local Access Project Need <br />1 Comment 1 Comment <br />• Concerns with changes in access from properties <br />and adjacent streets <br />• Will project still be needed as I-35 construction <br />is finished <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />