Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Coordination <br />Speed limits have been discussed with Ramsey County Sheriff’s office, City Attorney and <br />Prosecutor to ensure proper sign locations from engineering, legal and enforcement perspectives. <br />Final coordination efforts on sign placement with adjacent cities and Ramsey County Traffic <br />Engineering to ensure “sign pollution” and conflicting messages are eliminated. <br /> <br />Sign Locations/Sign Inventory/Speed Limit Lamp <br />Signs in the sign inventory have been reviewed and 25, 30, 35 and 40 MPH sign locations have <br />been placed on the speed limit map. Next step is the site visit with City staff to each sign <br />location to verify actual field location for conflicts, sign distances, consistent messaging, etc. <br /> <br />As a note, it was thought MSA streets were not eligible (or at least unclear if they were) for cities <br />to reduce their speed limits. Apparently there has been some discussions at MnDOT regarding <br />this as well. Recently, MnDOT Office of State Aid made a presentation at the City Engineers <br />Association Meeting and clarified that MSA roads are indeed eligible for cities to reduce their <br />speed limits. However, MnDOT does not have design standards (yet) for these reduced speed <br />limits, other than school zones. <br /> <br />The Arden Hills MSA roads are shown on the speed limit maps (Attachment A) as the thicker <br />dashed lines. Several MSA street have similar neighborhood road characteristics of the city street <br />currently being recommended for speed limit reductions. Other are more cut through in nature <br />and disperse traffic to more major roads. Two roads in particular, Lake Valentine Road and <br />Snelling Ave N, are MSA roads, but act differently in traffic patterns, destinations, and design <br />standards. With this new information, further discussions and reviews of these roads should take <br />place to determine which might or should be eligible for speed limit reductions, or other actions, <br />such as traffic calming measures. <br /> <br />Citywide Speed Limit Sign/Communications/Code <br />Speed limit signs have been discussed and for costs and consistent messaging, the 25 MPH speed <br />limit sign, with an “unless otherwise posted” placard seem to be the most standard and <br />economical signs to use. (Attachment B) <br /> <br />Communications with the public can continue at public hearing(s) at the Planning Commission <br />and/or City Council levels, providing information to residents on the City website, email, City- <br />wide emails, postings at City facilities, etc. and to the motoring public with “traffic change <br />ahead” signs once implemented. <br /> <br />Code sections are being reviewed with the City Attorney to determine what changes might need <br />to be made to enact the speed limit changes. <br /> <br />Project Timeline: <br />• February 21 - 25 – finalize coordination with County, field verify sign locations and <br />message to public <br />• February 28- March 4 – finalize any necessary Code changes, Council actions, public <br />hearing date(s) and order signing <br />• March/April – Council actions and sign installation for Spring 2022 implementation <br /> <br /> <br />