Laserfiche WebLink
March 2, 2022<br /> <br />Arden Hills Planning Commission<br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />1245 West Highway 96 <br />Arden Hills, MN  55112 <br />Dear Planning Commission Members:<br /> <br />This letter will provide you with the building details of our proposed project. In addition to the details of <br />the project we will provide the information that will hopefully result in the approval for a variance. A <br />variance in this case is required for four reasons. They are: 1. Side Yard Setback, 2. Minimum <br />Landscaped Area, 3. Maximum Structure Coverage and 4. Floor Area Ratio (FAR). <br /> <br />Before we address these standards I would like to give a short historical perspective relating to <br />Hunters Park Addition. In the early 70’s the City of Arden Hills approved a Planned Unit Development. <br />The plans called for 68 homes along with common areas and common roadways. The common areas, <br />or green space, was required to approve the small size of the lots. By the nature of the lot sizes the <br />homes were built quite close together and in many instances were non-conforming with setbacks and <br />other normal requirements. Whether the developers anticipated future additions to the homes no one <br />knows, but given the configuration there most likely could be none without applying for a variance. <br />Even faced with this, the city has approved 6 additions to homes in Hunters Park. We have no way of <br />knowing which of these required a variance, but it seems likely that some, if not all, did.<br /> <br />According to the Hunters Park Home Owners Association bylaws any addition to a home must be <br />approved by the Architectural and Environment Committee. We have received said approval and an <br />email to that effect is included in our packet.<br /> <br />Details of the Project <br />Included with this letter will be copies of the land survey and architectural drawings that detail the <br />dimensions as well as exterior view of the addition. <br /> <br />Currently, our home has a 20X12 deck on the rear (west side) of the house. We propose to remove <br />that deck in its entirety and replace it with a two level 14X14 foot addition. The plans also include a <br />14X12 foot deck off of the north side of the addition. There will be a foundation laid and 2X6 walls will <br />be built to frame in the addition. The lower level will have an 8 foot ceiling and the upper level will <br />have 8 foot sidewalls with a vaulted ceiling. The exterior of both levels will be “batten board on <br />sheeting” to conform with the current siding of the home. The roof of the addition will have two foot <br />eaves on each side and in the peak. I refer you to the plans for the window and door placements along <br />with the size. The current home has slider windows as will the addition. There will be a 14X8 concrete <br />slab on the north side of the lower level. The upper level deck will have composite decking with <br />aluminum railing. The roof will be gabled into the existing roof at a right angle. It will consist of <br />standard architectural shingles matching the existing roof. The roof will be a 6/12 pitch. The addition <br />on both levels will be electrically wired as per code. The upper level will be heated and cooled using a <br />heat pump duplex system. The lower level will have electric heat.<br /> <br />Variance Details <br />1.Side yard setback: A variance is needed because the distance between our home and the <br />neighbor to the north is 11.6 feet and not the required 15 feet. This is an existing non-conforming <br />issue and is not exacerbated by the plans for this addition. All other set backs conform to city <br />ordinance.<br /> <br />2.Minimum Landscaped Area: The minimum landscaped area allowed without a variance is 65% <br />or 3900 square feet. The existing landscaped area is 3925 square feet or 65%. After the addition I <br />calculated 3729 square feet which is 62% and would require a variance.<br />