My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-02-2022 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
05-02-2022 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 2:14:04 PM
Creation date
5/5/2022 2:12:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Huffman read a prepared statement to the JDA. He explained on January 22nd <br />the County Board met in a closed session to discuss future negotiations for the sale of Rice <br />Creek Commons to Alatus. He reported the County has been working to negotiate a Master <br />Development Agreement but has reached an impasse. He indicated Rice Creek Commons was <br />a shovel -ready, prime development opportunity that will benefit the community with jobs, <br />housing and economic growth. He anticipated that all parties want to move forward toward a <br />development solution but stated the County was losing momentum and development <br />opportunities as negotiations have not led to an MDA that was appropriate for all parties. As <br />the property owner, the County had a responsibility to its tax payers to develop this site. He <br />feared a construction season would be lost given the fact infrastructure plans were not in <br />place. He explained funding sources and financial tools are set to expire in 2019. He <br />commented the County would lose State approved funding for the spine road. He reported the <br />County has invested $40 million in the site, Alatus has invested millions in development plans <br />and now the project is stalled. Per Section 2.3.11 of the Joint Powers Agreement, the County <br />would like to resolve outstanding issues through a dispute resolution via mediation to move <br />the project forward. He stated appropriate housing, job and economic growth were very <br />important to the community. He explained the County wanted to ensure this project was <br />done right. He commented successful mediation may be the best option to move this project <br />forward. He stated he was not looking for JDA approval regarding mediation, but rather the <br />County and the City would have to approve this. <br />Commissioner Grant requested further information regarding the State approved funding for <br />the spine road. Ms. Collins reported the County had several million dollars allocated from the <br />State to assist with completing the spine road in 2019. <br />Commissioner Grant questioned who paid for the thumb roadway. Director Olson commented <br />this was paid for by Ramsey County. He noted there may have been some expenses that were <br />eligible for State funding. <br />Commissioner Holden stated she took offense to the statement, "the County has been <br />negotiating in good faith". She reported the City has been negotiating with the County since <br />2012 on this project. She explained she had attended heated meetings where County staff <br />was yelling at Councilmembers. She commented on all of the concessions the City had made in <br />order to meet the County's wishes. She stated the City has been negotiating on phasing, <br />density, building heights and flexibility issues with TCAAP since 2012. She indicated the City <br />has been working with the County, shoulder to shoulder to give them what they want. She <br />stated bullet three was a problem for her. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.