My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-22 PC Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2022
>
06-08-22 PC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2022 4:07:14 PM
Creation date
6/1/2022 4:06:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 4, 2022 3 <br /> <br />15. The increase in lot coverage and the decrease in landscaped area are unlikely to have a <br />negative impact on the Hunters Park Development, due to the abundance of shared <br />greenspace throughout the development. There is a total of seven acres of Homeowners <br />Association common greenspace throughout the neighborhood. <br />16. The variance request is not based on economic considerations alone. <br />17. The Applicants have received approval from the Hunters Park Architectural and <br />Environmental Committee for the proposed addition. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund asked what was behind the house on the west side. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe explained this was either the nature preserve or outlot. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund questioned what the size of the proposed addition would be. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe reported the applicants are proposing to construct a 14’ by 14’ addition. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman inquired if this variance request was unique to this lot, because of <br />the lot size. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe discussed the PUD amendment that was reviewed and process approved in <br />1985. She stated the original approval had varying standards by lot. She reported depending on <br />the size of the addition requested by a lot, the variance needed for each property would be unique <br />and there was no set standard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if this request would lead to additional variance requests. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe reported the City has heard four variances for the association in the past. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman questioned if the overall development should come forward versus <br />the City having to review each variance request separately. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe stated when the development was approved it was granted the flexibilities <br />that exist today. She indicated as circumstances change and homeowners want to make an <br />improvement to the property, this was triggering variance requests. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins requested further comment on the R-3 lot size requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.