Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MAY 23, 2022 9 <br /> <br />Variance Findings: <br />11. Variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br />12. A single-family detached dwelling with an addition is a reasonable use within the R-3 <br />District. <br />13. The nonconforming lot size for the R-3 District, which was approved as part of the <br />Hunters Park Planned Unit Development, and the substantial amount of shared open space <br />that is part of the development, presents a unique situation for the property owner. <br />14. The proposed addition will not reduce the existing side yard setbacks. The addition will <br />not require a rear yard setback variance. The nearest dwelling unit to the south of the <br />Subject Property is approximately 18 feet away. <br />15. The increase in lot coverage and the decrease in landscaped area are unlikely to have a <br />negative impact on the Hunters Park Development, due to the abundance of shared <br />greenspace throughout the development. There is a total of seven acres of Homeowners <br />Association common greenspace throughout the neighborhood. <br />16. The variance request is not based on economic considerations alone. <br />17. The Applicants have received approval from the Hunters Park Architectural and <br />Environmental Committee for the proposed addition. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe commented further on the request and reported the Planning Commission <br />recommended approval of Planning Case 22-004, for a Variance at 1152 Benton Way as presented <br />in the May 23, 2022 Report to the City Council as amended by the conditions below: <br /> <br />1. A Building Permit shall be issued prior to commencement of construction. <br />2. The proposed building shall conform to all other standards and regulations in City Code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes reported the Council received a comment objecting to this variance <br />today from the public. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the applicant was proposing a significant increase to a small lot. <br />She asked if a smaller addition would better fit the City’s requirements. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe commented the existing structure coverage already exceeded the City’s <br />maximum requirement. She noted any addition to this property would trigger a variance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott discussed the proposed finished area, which would be under the deck, <br />noting the deck would remain the same. <br /> <br />Bill Guelker, 1152 Benton Way, thanked the Council for considering his request. He stated the <br />current deck was 12’ by 20’ and this would be removed. He explained he would like to put a two <br />story 14’ by 14’ gabled addition onto the home along with a 12’ by 14’ deck in the space where <br />the existing deck was located. He reported the addition would house a dining room that would <br />better meet the needs of his family. He indicated his home backed up to Bethel University and <br />there was only woods behind his house. He stated he would like to take advantage of the view <br />from the back of his home. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned how far the current deck extends from the house. <br />