My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-22-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
07-11-22-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 2:08:41 PM
Creation date
7/7/2022 2:08:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JUNE 20, 2022 6 <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott felt they should do a cost benefit analysis to see if a consultant would get <br />paid back by the revenues they would recoup. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said councilmembers should talk to other cities while they are at the <br />League of Minnesota Cities conference to see how many have done an analysis. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said the Public Works Director had basically just given them an <br />analysis, and they didn’t need to hire a consultant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Radziej thought they should get a consultant or start replacing them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott said they should talk to other cities. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant agreed they should budget for 2023 and watch how many units fail. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the water fund. <br /> <br />E. Hazelnut Park Parking Lot Discussion <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault gave a brief overview of the situation with the parking lot at <br />Hazelnut Park, and what was recently discussed with the church. He said the church doesn’t have <br />the money to fix the parking lot. Staff spoke with them and they may be willing to give up some <br />of the land if the City fixes the parking lot and the cost is split, the church would need a payment <br />plan. The city attorney said it is legal for the City to pay for the cost and assess the church over <br />10-20 years. They are estimating $250,000 to redo the lot although it is not designed yet. The <br />church is overparked now, they have 139 stalls, but required to have 50. The church would like as <br />many stalls as possible. It makes the most sense to have them give up the northern section of the <br />lot to the City, which is about 15,000 square feet. That space could be used as a preschool soccer <br />field, volleyball court, dog park etc. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said the church was responsible to do seal coating and didn’t. She felt <br />they should pay to make up for what staff did to repair the lot. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault suggested the church split the cost 50/50 and give the City the land. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked staff if they were aware that there are ground up tires under the <br />asphalt. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said they took two soil borings but he didn’t <br />recall seeing rubber in them. The estimated cost wouldn’t include any curb and gutter or drainage <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes was surprised that the church was willing to give up land and pay 50%. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault said to be fair the terms may shift once they talk to the church <br />again. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.