My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
06-20-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 8:34:44 AM
Creation date
7/12/2022 8:34:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JUNE 20, 2022 5 <br />Finance Director Bauman said she didn't foresee the no reads getting any worse, but what will <br />happen is the loss in revenue from the meters themselves. The City continues to raise the rate to <br />make up for revenue lost. They look at all of the costs and set the revenues to handle costs and <br />capital expenditures. The increase is set to cover costs and to make sure there is enough fund <br />balance in the fund. <br />Mayor Grant asked how much was lost per year per home based upon the bill rate. <br />Finance Director Bauman calculated that with just under 13 million gallons unaccounted for, it <br />would cost each home $28.50 per year. She noted that not all water loss is from meters, and she <br />takes into account city usage from street sweeping, rink flooding etc. <br />Councilmember Radziej asked how much a new meter costs. <br />Finance Director Bauman replied that a residential meter body is $75, the register is $90 and the <br />endpoint is $150. When they are replacing the Galaxy with the new cellular units they are putting <br />in a register and endpoint for $240. They don't replace the meter body very often. <br />Councilmember Holmes wondered if they could assess the cost. <br />Finance Director Bauman said a new home owner will buy the meter. She felt if residents were <br />being assessed they wouldn't let anyone in to replace them. <br />Mayor Grant stated $240/meter X 3,200 meters is just over $750,000, not including installation. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said what is due for replacement is the meter <br />body, cities typically replace them every 15-20 years. Little Canada has the same Galaxy system <br />as we do and they are also transitioning. They did a full replacement meter and Galaxy boxes in <br />2010, and they are planning to do a full replacement in 2030 although they are transitioning to <br />cellular as the Galaxy's fail. Arden Hills is different as we have older bodies and the Galaxy <br />boxes were put in 10 years ago. There isn't a lot of drop off in the accuracy of the meter body but <br />we are getting past the 20-year mark. He would be OK keeping the meter bodies and getting more <br />life out of the Galaxy boxes unless they start seeing an uptick in the failure rate, and replace <br />everything at once instead of piecemealing it together. They could test several meters for <br />accuracy. <br />Mayor Grant stated that staff is asking if they should hire a consultant to help figure out the <br />configuration and what makes the most sense going forward. <br />Finance Director Bauman said that because of some issues they had last year they weren't able <br />to track the unaccounted-for water; she is waiting for the first quarter billing from Roseville to see <br />where we are sitting now and if the unaccounted-for water is still creeping up. <br />Councilmember Holden felt they should wait to hire a consultant. Budget it for next year and <br />bring someone on in the spring or fall. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen added that a consultant would give a <br />recommendation on what products to purchase. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.