My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1990-1998
>
1990
>
06-26-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:07:32 AM
Creation date
7/14/2022 10:31:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
View images
View plain text
44 . What department or official did you contact first about <br /> this inquiry? • <br /> 45. In general , were you satin- SATISFIED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I <br /> fied or dissatisfied with the DISSATISFIED. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> way your inquiry was handled? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 <br /> IF "DISSATISFIED, " ASK: <br /> 46. Why were you dissatisfied? <br /> 47 . Have you visited the Arden Hills YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I <br /> City Hall during the past two NO, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> years? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 <br /> 48 . From what you have heard or seen, EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> how would you rate the condition ADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> of the building excellent, ade- INADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> quate, inadequate, or poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 <br /> DON 'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 5 • <br /> -9 . In general , do you feel that the ADEQUATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> structure is adequate or inade- INADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> quate for providing service to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 <br /> the residents of Arden Hills? <br /> Let ' s talk about future economic development in Arden Hills. . . . <br /> 50 . How would you rate the pace of TOO RAPID. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> economic development in Arden ABOUT RIGHT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> Hills -- too rapid, about right, TOO SLOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> or too slow? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 4 <br /> IF OPINION IS GIVEN, ASK: <br /> 51 . Why do you feel that way? <br /> 52 . If the City were to attract more development , what kind <br /> would you most prefer? <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).