My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-29-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1990-1998
>
1990
>
05-29-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:12:47 AM
Creation date
7/14/2022 10:48:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 . Do you support or oppose the City STRONGLY SUPPORT. . . . . . 27% <br /> • taking an active and aggressive SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48% <br /> role in attracting targeted devel- OPPOSE. . 12% <br /> opment to Arden Hills? (WAIT FOR STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . 14% <br /> you feel strong-RESPONSE) And, do y - DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 11%g <br /> ly that way? <br /> 55 . Do you favor or oppose the City STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . . . . . . 9% <br /> offering financial incentives to FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28% <br /> attract various types of devel- OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24% <br /> opment to the community? (WAIT STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . 27% <br /> FOR RESPONSE) And, do you feel DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 13% <br /> strongly that way? <br /> The City could undertake many different initiatives to attract or <br /> discourage various types of future development. For each of the <br /> following categories , please tell me if you feel the City of <br /> Arden Hills should act aggressively to attract that type of <br /> growth, act aggressively to discourage that type of growth, or <br /> take no action one way or the other. If you have no opinion, just <br /> say so. <br /> AGG AGG NO DK/ <br /> ATT DIS ACT REF <br /> 56 . Single family homes for moderate <br /> income families. 56% 8% 30% 5% <br /> 57 . Low income family housing. 20% 40% 33% 8% <br /> • 58 . Apartment buildings. 16% 52% 27% 5% <br /> 59 . Townhouses. 44% 25% 26% 5% <br /> 60 . Condominiums. 32% 36% 27% 5% <br /> 61 . Senior citizen housing. 64% 14% 19% 4% <br /> 62 . Mobile homes. 7% 77% 13% 3% <br /> 63 . Retail shopping centers. 33% 43% 21% 3% <br /> 64 . Commercial office buildings. 49% 26% 21% 3% <br /> 65 . Light industrial plants. 44% 36% 15% 5% <br /> 66 . Parks and recreational open <br /> spaces. 75% 10% 12% 3% <br /> 67 . Should the TOP priority for devel- TAX BASE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29% <br /> opment in this city be on increa- JOBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12% <br /> sing the tax base, providing head- HOUSING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20% <br /> of-household jobs, providing hou- RECREATION. . . . . . . . . . . . 19% <br /> sing opportunities for young RETAIL SHOPPING. . . . . . . . 6% <br /> families and retirees, providing COMBINATION (VOL) . . . . . . 6% <br /> recreational and leisure time NONE OF ABOVE. . . . . . . . . . 4% <br /> offerings, or attracting more re- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 5% <br /> tail shopping opportunities? <br /> 68 . What should be the second prior- TAX BASE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13% <br /> ity? (RE-READ ABOVE LIST, IF JOBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19% <br /> NECESSARY. ) HOUSING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21% <br /> RECREATION. . . . . . . . . . . . 20% <br /> . RETAIL SHOPPING. . . . . . . . 8% <br /> COMBINATION (VOL) . . . . . . 6% <br /> NONE OF ABOVE. . . . . . . . . . 6% <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 8% <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.