Laserfiche WebLink
t_5 0 0 av PM/� - <br /> through the use of park dedication fees, and has never required <br /> any type of property tax funding. That financial situation may • <br /> change in the future. <br /> 96 . Would you favor or oppose a prop- STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . . . . . 22% <br /> erty tax increase to maintain and FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33% ,J <br /> improve the park system? (WAIT OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19% <br /> FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . 20% <br /> strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 7% <br /> IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR, " ASK: <br /> 97 . How much would you be willing NOTHING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1, <br /> to see your property taxes $10 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17% <br /> increase per year? Let's $20 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12% <br /> say, would you be willing to $30 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% <br /> see a yearly increase of $40 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5% <br /> $ ? (CHOOSE RANDOM START- $50 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7% <br /> ING LEVEL; MOVE UP OR DOWN $60 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3% <br /> DEPENDING ON ANSWER. ) How DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5% <br /> about $ ? (REPEAT PROCESS) REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br /> Changing topics . . . . <br /> 98 . Do you approve or disapprove of STRONGLY APPROVE. . . . . . 16% <br /> charitable gambling in Arden Hills APPROVE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23% <br /> establishments? (WAIT FOR RE- DISAPPROVE. . . . . . . . . . . . 15% <br /> SPONSE) And do you feel strongly STRONGLY DISAPPROVE. . . 36% <br /> that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 11% <br /> The City raises $110, 000 . 00 per year through taxes on charitable <br /> gambling activities. <br /> 99 . Would you support the elimination YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27% <br /> of charitable gambling in the city NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64% <br /> even if property taxes would have DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 9% <br /> to be raised or city services cut <br /> to make up the difference? <br /> Some people feel that neighborhood improvements should be paid <br /> for only by the people directly affected in the area. Others <br /> feel that neighborhood improvements should be paid for by general <br /> city funds, since property values across the city are indirectly <br /> impacted. For each of the following improvements, please tell me <br /> if you think that only property owners in the area, or the entire <br /> city should pay. . . . <br /> AREA CITY BOTH DKRF <br /> 100. Street lighting? 30% 47% 20% 3% <br /> 101. Sidewalks? 41% 38% 20% 5% <br /> 102 . Street reconstruction? 15% 61% 21% 3% <br /> 12 <br />