01-23-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

45 . What department or official did you contact first about • this inquiry? "CITY HALL, " 26% ; PARK & REC, 8% ; BLDG. INSPECTOR, 4% ; PUBLIC WORKS , 6% ; SCATTERED, 3%, DON'T KNOW, 7% . 46. In general, were you satis- SATISFIED. . . . . . . . . . . . . 41% fied or dissatisfied with the DISSATISFIED. . . . . . . . . . 13% way your inquiry was handled? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 IF "DISSATISFIED, " ASK: 47 . Why were you dissatisfied? NOTHING DONE, 11% ; INCORRECT INFORMATION, 2% . 48 . Have you visited the Arden Hills YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62% City Hall during the past two NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38% years? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 0% 49 . From what you have heard or seen, EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6% how would you rate the condition ADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56% of the building -- excellent, ade- INADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . 14% quate, inadequate, or poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 20% . 50 . In general , do you feel that the ADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59% structure is adequate or inade- INADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . 17% quate for providing service to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 24% the residents of Arden Hills? Let' s talk about future economic development in Arden Hills. . . . 51. How would you rate the pace of TOO RAPID. . . . . . . . . . . . . 13% economic development in Arden ABOUT RIGHT. . . . . . . . . . . 73% Hills -- too rapid, about right, TOO SLOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% or too slow? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 5% IF OPINION IS GIVEN, ASK: 52 . Why do you feel that way? GOOD MIX, 70% ; TOO FAST, 12% ; NEEDS NOT MET, 10% . 53 . If the City were to attract more development, what kind would you most prefer? DON'T KNOW, 15% ; NONE, 9%; RESIDENTIAL, 19% ; OFFICE, 25% ; RETAIL - STORES , 12% ; RECREATIONAL, 3% ; LIGHT INDUSTRY , 17% . 6