My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1990-1998
>
1990
>
01-23-1990 PTRC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 4:47:58 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 3:29:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There is the possibility that the Arsenal property in Arden Hills <br /> could become available for other uses. The property lies <br /> completely within the city and covers 2 , 331 acres. <br /> 69 . Would you favor or oppose the STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . . . . . 33% <br /> City initiating action to speed FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31% <br /> up the sale of this property? OPPOSE. . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% <br /> (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . . 8% <br /> strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 18% <br /> 70 . Should the City of Arden Hills PURCHASE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17% <br /> attempt to purchase that land to REGULATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65% <br /> directly control its use or should DEPENDS (VOL) . . . . . . . . . . 7% <br /> it try to regulate its future use DON'T CARE (VOL) . . . . . . . 3% <br /> through zoning decisions without DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 8% <br /> buying the property? <br /> If the City were to purchase and redevelop that land, substantial <br /> costs might be involved. The City would not only have to pay <br /> fair value for the land, but would have to bear costs to clean up <br /> contaminated soil and remove buried ammunition. The City might <br /> have to ask residents to permit the issuing of long term bonds to <br /> finance this project. Property owners would be asked to increase <br /> their property taxes to cover the principal and interest of the <br /> bonds. <br /> • 71. Would you favor or oppose a prop- STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . . . . . . 3% <br /> erty tax increase to purchase and FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12% <br /> redevelop the Arsenal site? (WAIT OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23% <br /> FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE . . . . . . . 51% <br /> strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 9% <br /> IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR, " ASK: <br /> 72 . How much would you be willing NOTHING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br /> to see your property taxes $25 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3% <br /> increase per year? Let' s $50 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5% <br /> say, would you be willing to $100 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5% <br /> see a yearly increase of $125 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br /> $ ? (CHOOSE RANDOM START- $150 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% <br /> ING LEVEL; MOVE UP OR DOWN $175 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% <br /> DEPENDING ON ANSWER. ) How DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% <br /> about $ ? (REPEAT PROCESS) REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% <br /> 73 . Should the arsenal property be SINGLE FAMILY DWELL. . . 19% <br /> developed PRIMARILY for single MULTIPLE' FAMILIES . . . . . . 0% <br /> family dwellings, multiple family RETAIL SHOPPING. . . . . . . . 3% <br /> housing, retail shopping, light LIGHT INDUSTRY. . . . . . . . 10% <br /> industry, offices, OR recreational OFFICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4% <br /> and park uses? RECREATIONAL/PARKS . . . . 17% <br /> COMBINATION (VOL) . . . . . 37% <br /> NONE OF ABOVE (VOL) . . . . 4% <br /> • DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 7% <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.