Laserfiche WebLink
Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 3 <br /> March 26,2002 <br /> • term plan following with an even longer-term view in how they intend to implement the plan to <br /> Council. He suggested, as a Committee, to respond in some way to the short term needs that <br /> would address ordinary park replacement items that are needed in the next year in addition to any <br /> capital improvements that need to take place in the next year. He stated that once they address <br /> the short term needs they can then move on to a medium range plan and asked for clarification. <br /> Mr. Post stated that this is more of a park fund question versus a general fund. He reviewed the <br /> dollars presently spent in the Park Department for vehicles and suggested reviewing the <br /> Comprehensive Plan and determine a cap on the dollar amount based upon recommendations <br /> from the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Mr. Post provided a budget schedule to the Committee and recapped what has occurred in the <br /> last ten years with the Park fund. He explained the content of the fund balance with the <br /> Committee noting revenue sources such as park dedication and interest earning funds. He <br /> reviewed the park dedication stating that this would not drive this fund or perpetuate itself. <br /> Committee Member Crassweller clarified that the Mayor asked the Committee to come up with a <br /> 5-year recommendation for spending of approximately$1 million noting that there would be <br /> some other sources of funding. Ms. Olson clarified that there was a possibility of funding that <br /> would come from other sources noting that they were not clear on where it would come from at <br /> this point. <br /> Committee Member Crassweller expressed his understanding stating that what he is trying to <br /> • determine is what the framework should be for the Committee to use in determining how the <br /> money would be used. He stated that between now and December they should recognize the <br /> need for some form of budgetary process. Mr. Post stated that what he reviewed with the <br /> Committee is that it does not impact the levy. He stated that it needs to be pared down some and <br /> reviewed the dollars noting that the only significant project that has occurred is Perry Park. <br /> Chair Straumann stated that they are approaching the next subject and asked Mr. Post if he had <br /> any more information to provide to the Committee. Mr. Post provided the Committee with a <br /> copy of the strategic analysis noting the level of priorities. <br /> Mr. Moore asked if there were any other questions for Mr. Post. <br /> Committee Member Crassweller clarified that they have to spend down and acknowledged that <br /> the Mayor has said that there might be alternative funding available. He asked Mr. Post if would <br /> make sense to break the process down into two pieces, a one year projection and a four year <br /> projection. Mr. Post agreed stating that the immediate need is to pull together the 2002 budget in <br /> order to get a picture of 2003. He encouraged the Committee to prioritize their needs and <br /> determine what would require the highest dollar. Chair Straumann stated that they do have Park <br /> funds available this year for things that need to be done. <br /> Chair Straumann clarified that Council did approve the plan as submitted noting that the thought <br /> • was that they would review where they are going with their recommendations. He suggested <br /> prioritizing the park signage adding that if they have to take from the Park fund they should move <br />