My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-2002 PTRC Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes (1999 to Present)
>
1999-2009
>
2002
>
04-23-2002 PTRC Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2024 12:11:04 AM
Creation date
7/21/2022 4:32:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 3 <br /> March 26,2002 <br /> • term plan following with an even longer-term view in how they intend to implement the plan to <br /> Council. He suggested, as a Committee, to respond in some way to the short term needs that <br /> would address ordinary park replacement items that are needed in the next year in addition to any <br /> capital improvements that need to take place in the next year. He stated that once they address <br /> the short term needs they can then move on to a medium range plan and asked for clarification. <br /> Mr. Post stated that this is more of a park fund question versus a general fund. He reviewed the <br /> dollars presently spent in the Park Department for vehicles and suggested reviewing the <br /> Comprehensive Plan and determine a cap on the dollar amount based upon recommendations <br /> from the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Mr. Post provided a budget schedule to the Committee and recapped what has occurred in the <br /> last ten years with the Park fund. He explained the content of the fund balance with the <br /> Committee noting revenue sources such as park dedication and interest earning funds. He <br /> reviewed the park dedication stating that this would not drive this fund or perpetuate itself. <br /> Committee Member Crassweller clarified that the Mayor asked the Committee to come up with a <br /> 5-year recommendation for spending of approximately$1 million noting that there would be <br /> some other sources of funding. Ms. Olson clarified that there was a possibility of funding that <br /> would come from other sources noting that they were not clear on where it would come from at <br /> this point. <br /> Committee Member Crassweller expressed his understanding stating that what he is trying to <br /> • determine is what the framework should be for the Committee to use in determining how the <br /> money would be used. He stated that between now and December they should recognize the <br /> need for some form of budgetary process. Mr. Post stated that what he reviewed with the <br /> Committee is that it does not impact the levy. He stated that it needs to be pared down some and <br /> reviewed the dollars noting that the only significant project that has occurred is Perry Park. <br /> Chair Straumann stated that they are approaching the next subject and asked Mr. Post if he had <br /> any more information to provide to the Committee. Mr. Post provided the Committee with a <br /> copy of the strategic analysis noting the level of priorities. <br /> Mr. Moore asked if there were any other questions for Mr. Post. <br /> Committee Member Crassweller clarified that they have to spend down and acknowledged that <br /> the Mayor has said that there might be alternative funding available. He asked Mr. Post if would <br /> make sense to break the process down into two pieces, a one year projection and a four year <br /> projection. Mr. Post agreed stating that the immediate need is to pull together the 2002 budget in <br /> order to get a picture of 2003. He encouraged the Committee to prioritize their needs and <br /> determine what would require the highest dollar. Chair Straumann stated that they do have Park <br /> funds available this year for things that need to be done. <br /> Chair Straumann clarified that Council did approve the plan as submitted noting that the thought <br /> • was that they would review where they are going with their recommendations. He suggested <br /> prioritizing the park signage adding that if they have to take from the Park fund they should move <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.