My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-22-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
06-27-22-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2022 8:11:53 AM
Creation date
7/26/2022 8:11:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 27, 2022 12 <br /> Councilmember Holden stated she recalled the development would have 105 units. <br /> City Planner Jagoe reported the developers concept plan had a range of units and noted the <br /> developer was proposing to have 124 units. She indicated high density residential allows for nine <br /> to twelve units per acre. She noted the number of units had been reduced to 124 in order to <br /> account for the land that was designated as wetlands. <br /> Mr. Fink stated the original plan was to purchase 10.27 acres and this was renegotiated in order <br /> to accommodate the wetlands and stormwater on the site. Trident was now requesting to purchase <br /> 10.75 acres of land in order to accommodate 12+ units per acre. He anticipated the request that <br /> would come to the Council would be about 14 units per acre, when all of the wetlands and <br /> stormwater land was removed from the property. <br /> Mayor Grant requested staff speak to the history of this property. <br /> City Planner Jagoe provided a detailed history of this property. It was noted the site was guided <br /> for Public and Institutional in 1998. <br /> Mayor Grant reported this property was bordered by Highway 10 and Highway 96 and two <br /> churches,which made it a difficult property to develop. <br /> Councilmember Scott explained he lived in the Briarknoll neighborhood and he agreed this was <br /> the best option to come to the City thus far. He indicated he would be supporting the <br /> comprehensive plan amendment because it gives the City additional flexibility in the future. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br /> motion to approve Planning Case 22-009 for a Future Land Use Map and <br /> Chapter 6 Text Amendments to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan at 1700 <br /> Hi0way 96 West, based on the findings of fact and the report submitted to <br /> the City Council on June 27, 2022, and direct the City Attorney to prepare a <br /> Resolution. <br /> Mayor Grant encouraged Trident Development to work carefully with the community on this <br /> project. He stated he would be supporting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He then asked <br /> staff to complete a roll call vote for this item. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted she would not be supporting this request. She stated she did not <br /> support 14+ units per acre on this property and she could not support this moving forward until <br /> she knew what the plan was. <br /> A roll call vote was taken. The motion to approve Planning Case 22-009 for a <br /> Future Land Use Map and Chapter 6 Text Amendments to the 2040 <br /> Comprehensive Plan at 1700 Highway 96 West, based on the findings of fact <br /> and the report submitted to the City Council on June 27, 2022, carried 4-1 <br /> (Councilmember Holden opposed). <br /> D. Resolution 2022-037 Variance-4073 Valentine Court—Planning Case 22-008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.