My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1985 PTRC Meeting Agenda - Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
11-26-1985 PTRC Meeting Agenda - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 12:18:34 AM
Creation date
8/12/2022 9:15:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS <br /> • 1. The development of a true parkway system, (that is scenic roadways <br /> with limited access and for non-commercial traffic only) is not <br /> feasible in Arden Hills because the system must follow existing <br /> routes which cannot be restricted in that manner. <br /> 2. If the City wishes to pursue the development of a parkway system, <br /> its efforts should concentrate on: <br /> Separation of bike/pedestrian paths from the roadway to <br /> reduce pavement widths, and <br /> �b. Beautification of roadways through more intense and/or <br /> uniform landscaping. <br /> 3. The County's present restrictions on landscaping within the rights- <br /> of-way of County roads present a major barrier to the development <br /> of streets with parkway character. If significant landscaping is <br /> to be accomplished, it will have to be located behind the right-of- <br /> way 1 i ne. ar al I-NI - r cry,,, A ��e.�C�a r�� /rvt�V^ a�° �o� <br /> Una<ss G)$ cM► �cj� .,, Y4 .1 /w f .,.lw WI/ . <br /> l 4 Development Zo <br /> parkway cross-section within segments of candidate <br /> parkway routth right-of-way widths of less than 80 feet is not <br /> considered f1e..r J�?p✓�it.dl J' �'+�I�. <br /> 5. Establishment of a parkway system in Arden Hills can only be <br /> accomplished through a long-term improvement plan. Implementation <br /> • of such a plan would require: <br /> a. Co-ordination with Ramsey County in the design of future <br /> County roa recons ruction projects in order to achieve <br /> separated bikeLuedestrian paths and reduce_rayPmPnt <br /> widths. <br /> b. Working with the County to achieve the relaxation of the <br /> �� present landscaping restrictions. `— <br /> C. Co-or ina io wi �n iapro erty owners to en- <br /> courage priva e p an ing, or permit pub is y financed ? <br /> planting on private property, to enhance the parkway <br /> U character.;,'" e- <br /> p- A r WA-We- XIA.,V , <br /> ' <br /> d. Co-ordinate with NSP for the burl of overhead power <br /> lines/when replacement of various segments is required. <br /> nod 7•-��c.nii�,.., lihn� <br /> 6. Based upon the right-of-way widths, traffic volume, availability of <br /> __— landscaping space, beyond right-of-way lines, and exposure to <br /> natural amenities, the following routes have the greatest potential <br /> for parkway development: <br /> a. Lake Johanna Boulevard from Stowe Avenue to Snelling <br /> b. Snelling Avenue from T.H. 51 to I-694 <br /> C. Co. Rd. E-2 from Snelling Avenue to I-35W <br /> -A� �-42 <br /> -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.