Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> Related Questions: <br /> I . In your opinion, what are the greatest needs for the regional system? <br /> Where are problems the greatest? <br /> 2. Are the categories for priority the most appropriate statements the Council <br /> can make to direct the acquisition of land and development of facilities <br /> for regional recreation open space? <br /> 3. Do the categories and the goal and objective statements of the Council <br /> match? Do both direct the system to the same point and will it meet <br /> regional needs for recreation open space? <br /> 4. Is the process by which priorities are decided adequate and appropriate? <br /> How might it be improved? <br /> ISSUE 4. Should there be a change in the scope of the regional system or the <br /> Councils role in implementing the system? <br /> The regional recreation open space system emphasizes natural resource based <br /> recreation opportunities (picnicking, swimming, boating, fishing, trail uses, <br /> camping and nature interpretation) . A few existing special uses include a zoo, <br /> a conservatory and a floral display garden. <br /> • Regional system components now are: <br /> o Park Reserves - large, open, natural areas. <br /> o Regional Park - moderately large, open spaces with good recreation <br /> resources such as lakes. <br /> o Regional Trail Corridors - linear parkland for trail activities. <br /> o Regional Historic Parks - areas of regional historic importance. <br /> o Regional Special Recreation Use Areas - areas which support unique <br /> recreation uses for the region. <br /> Related Questions: <br /> 1. Should the system incorporate more special recreation uses? If so, what <br /> kind? <br /> 2. Would providing some special attractions in certain parks encourage use <br /> or redistribute use to new parks? Would that be desirable? <br /> 3. Does the region have a responsibility for unique or unusually large rec- <br /> reation facilities now provided by municipalities? What would the benefits <br /> or drawbacks be of bringing these into a regional plan? <br /> 4. Are there some traditionally municipal facilities that are not being ade- <br /> quately provided or might be discontinued? What are they? Is there a <br /> regional responsibility for these? <br /> 5. Are the current classifications and definitions of regional system com- <br /> ponents appropriate? Should some be deleted or others added? Should some <br /> be modified? <br />