Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br /> Two arguments against-freeing up interim revenue use are: <br /> - Policy should not endorse management which is aimed at generating maximum <br /> revenue over a prolonged period. That is not the purpose for which the <br /> land was acquired. <br /> - Interim uses could be viewed by surrounding municipalities as a source of <br /> tax revenues. Land put into recreation open space has been removed from <br /> tax rolls for a public use. If it is used as a revenue generator by other <br /> use for some extended time, the municipality from which the land was <br /> removed might feel it has a supportable claim. <br /> Related Questions: <br /> 1. What limits, if any, are appropriate to place on generation and expendi- <br /> tures of revenues earned from non-recreation activity in regional recrea- <br /> tion open space? <br /> 2. Is generation of revenue a reasonable use of part of a regional park if it <br /> supports recreation services elsewhere? <br /> i <br /> • <br /> SA2082-PHOPNI <br /> 5.30.84 <br /> i <br />