My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-1984 PTRC Agenda - Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
01-10-1984 PTRC Agenda - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 4:51:48 PM
Creation date
8/12/2022 11:02:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes of Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting <br /> Village of Arden Hills- <br /> Tuesday , November 8 , 1983 - 7: 30 p .m. <br /> Village Hail <br /> 7 : 30 p .m. - Jeanne Gilbert submitted her resignation from the <br /> Parks and Recreation Committee . <br /> Call to Order <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7 :40 p.m by Chairman Sand . <br /> Roll Call <br /> Present - D. Sand, A. Anderson , G. Dreyling, J . Otto, T. Sather, <br /> M. WIId .. _ _ <br /> Absent - M. Bergene , K. Boss , D. Klick, D. Kostishack, <br /> P . Lippert, T . Tuggle. <br /> Also Present - Council,man T. Mulcahy , Parks Director J . Buckley . U <br /> Approval of Minutes ` <br /> The motion to approve the Minutes of 9/ 13/83 Parks and Recreation <br /> Committee Meeting was made by Otto and seconded by Sather. Motion <br /> carried unanimously . <br /> ;K } <br /> Counci I Report - J <br /> Councilman Mulcahy -reported Council approval of the Parks budget <br /> _for _1984", Park Director' s attendance at the Minnesota Recreation <br /> and Parks Association Fall Conference and reported that Council <br /> reviewed the Charles Tooker Evaluation of Arden Hills Parks and /4,11 <br /> Recreation Department . Councilman Mulcahy expanded on the Tooker <br /> evaluation by reminding the committee that the study was engaged <br /> to compare Arden Hills ' parks system to similar cities , and to <br /> provide a non-internal look at the general direction of the Arden <br /> Hills parks and recreation program and development. Mulcahy <br /> stated that Council generally felt the Tooker Evaluation to be <br /> a good document, providing a good basis for the Council ; noted <br /> that Council will be looking for flow of responses from the <br /> Committee as a result of the Committee 's discussions of the Tooker <br /> Evaluation . " <br /> Tooker Report <br /> Committee Discussion and Comments : <br /> - The Evaluation is reassuring and confirmation of present <br /> policy ; shows we have good program and that our director <br /> has done a good ,job . <br /> - if we are going to follow direction from the Evaluation , we <br /> are going to have to expand program which wilt mean at feast <br /> another part-time program developer. <br /> - We could make .some. kind of attempt: to' make' -footnotes . re <br /> maintenance- 1cost "on Capital Plan .' <br /> Kind of questionnaire up-date : are educational level and <br /> _ age questions etc . `necessary? <br /> - The Evaluation has rural rather than urban perspectives . <br /> , - The Evaluation did not take into account adjoining facilities <br /> and programs in our neighboring communities . <br /> - Sand asked the _Committee to focus on three things : <br /> • 1 ) Development of an administrative manual , <br /> 2 ) Updating ,of. ,the 1973 questionnaire , and <br /> �,�J 3 ) Establishment of a written policy on bequests . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.