My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-02-1988 PTRC Agenda-Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
11-02-1988 PTRC Agenda-Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 12:05:30 AM
Creation date
8/16/2022 4:28:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Commission Meeting, November 2, 1988 <br /> Page 3 <br /> CASE #88-34 (Cont'd) Piotrowski moved, seconded by Malone, that Commission <br /> recommend to Council approval of Case #88-34, Sign Setback <br /> and Length Variances, American Family Insurance Company, 3920 Northwoods Drive, <br /> . as requested, based on the large space of vacant land between the highway <br /> right-of-way and the applicant's property which justifies the setback variance, <br /> and justification for the sign length variance based on the uniquely shaped logo <br /> of the company and the fact that the sign meets the ordinance area requirements <br /> area while exceeding the length requirements. Motion carried unanimously. (6-0) <br /> PUBLIC HEARING <br /> CASE #88-32, AMEND Chairman Curtis opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. and <br /> SEC. V, ZONING ORD. Deputy Clerk Iago verified publication of the Notice of <br /> TO ADD GB DISTRICT Hearing in the New Brighton Bulletin on Wednesday, October <br /> (REZONE FROM I-1 & 19, 1988, and mailing to affected property owners the same <br /> R-2 TO GB DISTRICT) date. <br /> Planner Bergly outlined the area proposed for Rezoning and referred Commission <br /> to the proposed "Land Use & Circulation Plan" he prepared which encompasses a <br /> portion of an R-1 District in the southeast corner and substantial portion of an <br /> existing I-1 District in the Round Lake Study Area. He stated the proposed Zoning <br /> to the Gateway Business District includes both the I-1 and R-2 District as shown <br /> on the diagram. <br /> The Planner advised that the proposed Rezoning to the Gateway Business District <br /> and the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan are "tied together" and dependent <br /> upon one another for approval. <br /> Bergly stated the diagram delineates land use areas and pedestrian and vehicular <br /> circulation routes are intended to be a general guide for owners and developers <br /> within the spirit and regulations of the planning study for I-694/I-35W. He <br /> explained the amendment to the Comprehensive plan could be in the form of a <br /> policy statement or a diagram which illustrates the policies/proposed use for the <br /> area. <br /> The Planner explained the proposed four-lane divided entrance drive coming in a <br /> southerly direction into the site and advised developers would propose how the <br /> drive would be extended to the site they propose to develop. He stated the <br /> diagram shows existing office/showroom/warehouse uses and attractive land at the <br /> intersection of Highway 96 and I-35W designated for business use. Bergly advised <br /> the high density residential area indicated on the high-land closest to the lake; <br /> the rational for placement of high density residential in this area was due to <br /> traffic concerns. He noted there had been discussion as to whether or not this <br /> area should be shown on the plan; another option would be to include that area as <br /> part of the total business area and indicate by the Study report the possibility <br /> of high density residential in this area. <br /> The Planner advised a park is shown in the area south of Round Lake and an area <br /> of medium density residential and both are included in the existing Comprehensive <br /> Plan. He explained the exception would be the area in the southeast corner of the <br /> study area which is now shown as medium/high density residential; it was <br /> previously shown as medium density residential. Bergly stated this was changed <br /> due to the recent Commission review of a sketch plan for that area; it appeared <br /> the Commission consensus was to favor that approach. <br /> • Bergly concluded the Gateway Business District Zoning proposed for the area would <br /> be a planned "Business Campus" development. He stated it was intentionally left <br /> open for a number of different uses to allow developers to propose what they <br /> would do with the site and the City would respond to the proposals. He further <br /> advised the City preference would be that the entire 85-acres in the southern <br /> area of the site be developed by a single developer; the Ordinance provides for <br /> development of smaller parcels of approximately 20-acres and the minimum size <br /> tracts would be 5-acres with minor exceptions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.