My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-22-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
07-25-22-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2022 11:47:31 AM
Creation date
8/24/2022 11:47:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — JULY 25, 2022 9 <br />Mr. Carlson stated this may be a question for all of the tenants versus just the car wash. He <br />anticipated the car wash was feeling good about their parking. He discussed how the four <br />businesses would share parking on the site. He was of the opinion the site was adequately <br />parked. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned why the car wash had nine vacuums and questioned if one <br />or two of these spaces could be used for employee parking. She asked when peak times were for <br />the car wash. <br />Jeremiah Harder, Director of Project Management and Development for City Ventures a parent <br />company of Rocket Car Wash, explained store data across the country shows there was a need for <br />nine vacuums. He stated peak hours for the car wash would be from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. <br />Councilmember Holden inquired what the hours of operation would be for the dental office and <br />requested further information on how the dental chairs would work. <br />Mr. Carlson stated this would generally be from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. He provided the <br />Council with further information on how the nine dental chairs would operate. <br />Councilmember Holmes requested further information on the proposed signage for the Rocket <br />Car Wash. She was of the opinion that the proposed signage would not be effective given the <br />buildings location. <br />Mr. Harder discussed the proposed signage, noting the visuals were rough draft models. He <br />indicated the signs do have a lot of dead space within the logo, stating the sign actually has only <br />63 square feet. He explained all signs would be site specific and would be located at the peak of <br />the building. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned if the sign on the east elevation would be in a different <br />location. <br />Mr. Harder stated this might be the case noting that this decision would be part of the final sign <br />package with the sign company based on this specific site and they are aware they have to submit <br />a separate sign permit to the City. <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern with having a sign located only in the peak. <br />Mr. Carlson stated he would continue to advocate for the proposed signage given the fact this <br />building would be setback quite far. <br />Mr. Harder indicated the free vacuum sign could be centered to break up the space. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the materials that would be used on the car wash building. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she was concerned with how long the car wash was and how the <br />long face would have the same building materials with nothing to break it up. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.