Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of Regular Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting <br /> Village of Arden Hills <br /> January 28, 1986 <br /> Village Hall <br /> Call to Order - <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Acting Chair Anderson. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Present: A. Anderson, K. Enrooth, D. Messerly, J. Mishek, A. Montgomery, <br /> T. Mulcahy, J. Otto, M. Peterson, K. Rauenhorst <br /> Absent: D. Sand, G. Dreyling, M. Gillies <br /> Also Present: Councilman T. Sather <br /> Parks Director J. T. Buckley <br /> City Planner Orlyn Miller <br /> Oaths cf Office <br /> The oath of office was administered to those present by Councilman Sather. <br /> Approval of Minutes <br /> Motion was made by Mulcahy, seconded by Rauenhorst, that the minutes of <br /> November 26 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Hamline Avenue Development Proposal - Orlyn Miller <br /> Miller evaluated with the committee the potentials for landscaping along <br /> Hamline Avenue relative to different road widths and burying of overhead <br /> lines. To do this, he presented cross-sectional drawings of Hamline utilizing <br /> all possible combinations of road widths and right-of-ways, with lines <br /> buried and with lines overhead. <br /> The major deterrents to landscaping, as pointed out at an earlier meeting, <br /> are width of right-of-way and preponderance of overhead lines. He noted <br /> that 92% of the roadway is impacted by overhead lines; the clearance of <br /> the lowest line is 15 to 20 feet. <br /> He added that there had been some discussion of having turn lanes only <br /> at intersections, rather than a continuous turn lane. Approximately 900 <br /> feet is required to construct a turn lane (tapering out, providing for <br /> stacking of cars, tapering in); allowing for 800 feet, if turn lanes were <br /> constructed at each intersection as an alternative to a continuous turn <br /> lane, 95% of the road would be impacted by turn lanes. If, as an alternative, <br /> turn lanes were constructed at selected intersections (for discussion <br /> purposes, he mentioned Colleen, Floral, Wyncrest, Arden View, Nursery <br /> Hill Lane, and STH 96), 57% would be impacted. Miller said he is not <br /> aware of standards set up to justify turn lanes (i.e. volume of traffic, <br /> number of rear end accidents). <br /> Miller's conclusions were: <br /> The alternative with the greatest landscaping potential has the nar- <br /> rowest roadway and buried electric and telephone lines. The widest <br /> roadway combined with overhead wires on both sides of the ROW creates <br /> the greatest limitations. <br /> eAlthough roadway width obviously impacts landscaping potential, this <br /> study confirms that the greatest deterrent to landscaping is the <br /> overhead wires at the right-of-way edges. <br />