04-05-1989 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Agenda

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Commission Meeting, 4-5-89 Page 4 CASE #88-30 (Cont'd) The architect explained the number of units will not change, only the number of bedrooms; the building footprint change would not be significant. He advised the building length would vary between 188 ft. and 200 ft. ; he stated the mix would be determined after the market study is completed. Planner Bergly recommended a screening wall or increased landscaping between Buildings 3 and 4, along I-694, to provide a sound barrier; he noted there is room for a berm in that area. Other Commission concerns expressed: -There should be a figure set for type of units included in the project to determine the length of the buildings. -The wall mounted lighting should be low intensity and not significantly impact the neighboring properties. -The building exterior materials and colors should be reviewed by the Commission. -Landscaping materials should meet minimum requirements. -Blacktopped surface for fire vehicle access should be comparable with the road surface required at the MSI site. Chairman Probst advised the developer that the Commission will not consider sign variances for this site; it does not appear there would be basis for requesting variances. Planner Bergly suggested the approval could stipulate that the developer determine exterior detail and colors of the buildings and return for Commission review and input. • Cook stated he would be agreeable to return with these items depending upon the time-frame. Probst explained the City has been working to develop the Gateway Business District with the land directly to the west of this site; he noted the City has retained a Financial Consultant to review the possibility of creating a Tax Increment Finance District that will encompass this site area. He questioned if there is an opportunity for the City to work with Cook, relative to the timing of the construction start for this project, to capture increments. Probst advised it is his understanding that once permits are issued it is not possible to take the increment from the parcel. Cook stated he would be agreeable to work with the City if it is a reasonable time period, within the next 90 to 120 days; he noted there was prior discussion of this matter with the City. Chairman Probst asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in favor of or opposed to the project. John Stenglein, 1785 West County Road F, spoke in favor of the proposed development; he stated it is his opinion the proposal is the highest and best use for the site and he is impressed with the plan. Stenglein stated the developer has done a wonderful job. There were no further comments from the floor. Chairman Probst closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. • Probst recommended the Engineer be requested to review and recommend the correct weight and width for the roadway utilized by fire vehicles.