My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-07-1989 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1980-2003
>
1989
>
06-07-1989 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:15:22 AM
Creation date
9/1/2022 12:39:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting, June 7, 1989 <br /> Page 2 <br /> CASE #89-07 (Cont'd) Planner Bergly recommended approval of the SUP and listed <br /> rationale on page 2 of his report. He suggested <br /> Commission may wish to review the code to discuss whether or not this type of <br /> • request should be included in the "Miscellaneous Towers" classification of the <br /> Zoning Code or if the procedure for application and review should be changed. <br /> Chairman Probst questioned if there was anyone present who wished to be heard. <br /> Sheri Wingard, property manager at 8 Pine Tree Drive, was present to represent <br /> the property owner and spoke in support of the proposed antenna installation. <br /> Chairman Probst asked if there were any further comments. There was no response <br /> and the public hearing was closed at 7:40 p.m. <br /> Zehm moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Commission <br /> recommend to Council approval of Case #89-07, Special Use Permit to install a 4 <br /> ft. x 6 ft. "miscellaneous tower" for Farmers Insurance Group at 8 Pine Tree <br /> Drive, based on the following factors: 1. The antenna is not visible from nearby <br /> residences, 2. The antenna is barely visible from nearby businesses and streets, <br /> and 3. The antenna is far less obtrusive than most of the rooftop mechanical <br /> equipment in the vicinity. Motion carried unanimously. (7-0) <br /> Chairman Probst questioned what steps staff would be taking to notify the <br /> property owner the existing antenna on the roof requires a special use permit. <br /> Planner Bergly advised he has discussed the matter briefly with Council and they <br /> indicated the property managers in all buildings in the City should be notified <br /> of the Ordinances pertaining to antennas and other matters such as; parking, <br /> • outside storage, etc. Bergly stated a letter is being drafted by staff for <br /> Council review. <br /> Wingert, property manager for 8 Pine Tree Drive, advised Commission the tenant <br /> had been advised of the requirements and would make application for the permit. <br /> Commission discussed painting the antenna and if the reception would be altered <br /> by painting. <br /> Myrhe stated the antenna can be painted, however, some manufacturers do not <br /> recommend painting. <br /> Member Woodburn recalled neighborhood concern relative to a ground-based antenna <br /> along County Road E and another in the Fairview Avenue area. <br /> Councilmember Winiecki suggested the "Satellite Dish Antennae" be separated from <br /> the "Miscellaneous Towers" definition. She noted that applications for towers, <br /> such as radio towers, have been controversial in the city. <br /> CASE #89-06; VAR'S Planner Bergly reviewed his report of 6-7-89, relative to <br /> SIDEYARD & LKSHORE, an application for an eight foot sideyard setback <br /> 3220 NO. HAMLINE, variance and a five foot lakeshore setback variance, 3220 <br /> T. LYNCH No. Hamline Avenue, Thomas Lynch. <br /> The Planner briefly explained the background of previous variances granted for <br /> • this property; a larger lot was divided requiring a Lot Area Variance and a <br /> setback variance for a patio was also approved. He stated the owner designed a <br /> home to fit the unconventionally shaped lot and now is requesting a variance to <br /> construct a screened porch over the existing concrete patio. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.