My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-07 Minutes for approval
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-11-07-R
>
06-11-07 Minutes for approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:24:24 AM
Creation date
9/22/2022 10:46:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—APRIL 16, 2007 5 <br /> Councilmember Grant asked if Highway 10 is considered part of the off ramp and if so, is it part <br /> • of the Federal system. <br /> Mr. Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County, stated Highway 10 is part of the federal transportation system. <br /> A discussion on Highway 10 ensued. <br /> Councilmember Grant asked if the county had enough money to do the project. <br /> Mr. Tolaas replied the County has funding to do the work related to CSAH 96. <br /> Mr. Tolaas explained how federal money can be used for City and County road projects. <br /> Mayor Harpstead commented that the schedule is complicated. He discussed the timeline to <br /> complete the County Road H, Highway 10, and CSAH 96. <br /> A discussion ensued on the timeline and funding process. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated the issue of the timeline is getting onto the Governors bonding bill for <br /> the Highway 10, and CSAH 96 project. <br /> City Administrator Wolfe stated the application deadline for the Governor's bonding bill is May <br /> 2007. <br /> • A discussion on 35W, 694 and Highway 10 ensued. <br /> Ms. Gen McJilton, RRLD/Ryan, stated that the resolution formalizing a design concept for <br /> County Road H, Highway 10, and CSAH 96 would begin the project in fall of 2008 and conclude <br /> the fall of 2009. She commented they are looking for available funding at the Federal, State, or <br /> County level and need a resolution that enables them to be reimbursed if the City is able to <br /> acquire additional funding from the federal or state government. <br /> A discussion on the County Road H, Highway 10, and CSAH 96 projects ensued. <br /> 2. Next Steps <br /> Mayor Harpstead recommended breaking the discussion into the two intersections. <br /> A discussion on how the resolution should be worded ensued. <br /> Mayor Harpstead commented the $20 million requested in the federal process is tied to a specific <br /> project (County Road H). He stated the City must come up with a 20%match of the total cost of <br /> the project; this is the 80/20 project match. He explained the concept of the 80/20 project match <br /> and understanding the funding timelines. The match could come from the state, county, Met <br /> • Council, or other sources. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.