My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-07 Minutes for Approval
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-25-07-R
>
06-25-07 Minutes for Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:27:57 AM
Creation date
9/22/2022 10:49:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—MAY 21,2007 3 <br /> A discussion ensued with examples of how mitigation would work. <br /> Ms. Frick explained an AUAR did not make a decision or change a comprehensive plan. <br /> She stated the AUAR is an informational document that informs the decisions the City <br /> needed to make, establishes mitigation expectations, assigns responsibility, and provides <br /> documentation so that as developments move forward,it is available. <br /> Ms. Frick explained the AUAR is the City's document and mitigation plan in that if over <br /> time, one development proposal falls through, and another picks it up, the AUAR is a tool <br /> to set guidelines. She explained the AUAR is flexible enough of look at the set <br /> parameters and determine if the new developer is compatible to eliminate the need for a <br /> new AUAR. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked Ms. Frick what she would work from when doing the <br /> assessment as this is Arden Hills' kick-off with an AUAR. <br /> Ms. Frick replied there is a no-build scenario, a maximum build scenario, and a third plan <br /> currently in the making. She explained the development figures are provided to the City, <br /> refined, and a decision made on the actual build out plan. <br /> City Administrator Wolfe clarified that the plans would be brought forward through the <br /> development process and refined. <br /> iCouncilmember McClung asked how the maximum build is determined. <br /> Ms. Frick replied it is basically what is consistent with the comprehensive plan. She <br /> stated the purpose of looking at the maximum build plan is to understand and quantify the <br /> maximum impact to accommodate the maximum build. She stated that as the Master <br /> Plan is refined,the community's vision is rolled into it. <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked what the maximum build out is and how the impact would be <br /> determined. <br /> Ms. Frick restated the purpose in looking at the maximum build is to look at what the <br /> maximum impact would be and to quantify this. She explained the various types of <br /> impacts and how to look at what the critical issues would be, such as traffic. <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked if it were possible to have a maximum build scenario for each sub <br /> category. <br /> Ms. Frick replied she did not see that happening, rather they would settle on a build <br /> scenario that is a reasonable maximum build. She commented scenarios are from the <br /> Master Plan process. <br /> • Councilmember Holden asked Ms. Frick what the maximum density is based upon. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.