My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-2007 Minutes for Approval
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
03-12-07-R
>
03-12-2007 Minutes for Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 6:32:45 AM
Creation date
9/27/2022 10:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—February 20, 2007 <br /> • Mayor Harpstead recommended that members of the City Council meet with their elected <br /> officials to discuss the transportation needs for Arden Hills. The City Council will discuss the <br /> City's membership in the I-35W Corridor Coalition at the last meeting in March. <br /> Process and Procedures for Sale of City-Owned Property- <br /> Mayor Stan Harpstead noted that the purpose of this discussion to set processes and procedures <br /> for disposing for City owned property. <br /> Community Development Director Karen Barton noted that in an effort to establish formal <br /> guidelines for the sale of city-owned property, staff is presenting several options for City Council <br /> consideration. <br /> OPTION ONE: Formal Request for Proposal (RFP) process without development <br /> specifications (Please see attachment A for example) <br /> The City may wish to issue an RFP to garner proposals from qualified developers relating to <br /> development/redevelopment of the property simply relying on zoning requirements to guide the <br /> plans. <br /> PROS: This option allows for maximum flexibility and creativity, within zoning guidelines, on <br /> the part of the developer. <br /> • CONS: The City foregoes a certain amount of control in the development of the property, <br /> relying solely on zoning to guide the plans. <br /> OPTION TWO: Formal RFP process with development <br /> e elopment specifications (Please see <br /> Attachment B for example) <br /> In this option, the City would prepare development guidelines for the redevelopment of the <br /> property. These guidelines can range from somewhat general (i.e., simply specifying the building <br /> types and densities) to very detailed (i.e., specifying design guidelines including finishes, <br /> signage, amenities, in addition to building types and densities). <br /> PROS: The City has the opportunity to create development guidelines for the property that are <br /> compatible with and desirable to the surrounding neighborhoods, taking into consideration such <br /> things as traffic generation, noise, visual impacts, etc. <br /> CONS: Development guidelines set by the City may be deemed too restrictive to attract <br /> economically feasible development proposals. <br /> OPTION THREE: Market and sell land through real estate broker <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.