Laserfiche WebLink
Applicants are proposing a landscaped area of 79.4% or 21,516 square feet. The R-I District allows <br />for a maximum structure coverage of 25% or 6,775 square feet. The Applicants are proposing a <br />structure coverage of 13.7% or 3,712 square feet. In the R-1 District, the maximum allowed Floor <br />Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.3, or 8,129 square feet. The applicants are proposing a FAR of 0.12 or 3,252 <br />square feet. <br />The table below provides the district standards for the R-1 District and the preliminary analysis <br />for the proposed development: <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Lot Area <br />Minimum 14,000 SF <br />27,098 SF <br />Front Yard Setback <br />Minimum 40' <br />28' 11" <br />Side Yard Setback <br />10, Minimum <br />30' 10" <br />Setbackfrom OHWL <br />75' Minimum <br />141' 1" <br />Landscaped Area <br />Greater than 65% <br />79.4% <br />Structure Coverage <br />Less than 25% <br />20.6% <br />Floor Area Ratio <br />Less than 0.3 <br />0.12 <br />Maximum Height <br />35' <br />26' 8" <br />2. Variance Review <br />The role of the Planning Commission is to determine and consider how the facts presented to them <br />compare with the city's articulated standards. The Commission should base their decision on the <br />facts presented and then apply those facts to the legal standards contained in city ordinances and <br />relevant state law. Neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for granting or denying a <br />variance request. While the Planning Commission may feel their decision should reflect the overall <br />will of the residents, the task in considering a variance request is limited to evaluating how the <br />variance application meets the statutory practical difficulties factors. Residents can often provide <br />important facts that may help in addressing these factors, however, unsubstantiated opinions and <br />reactions to a request do not form a legitimate basis for a variance decision. <br />The Planning Commission may impose conditions when granting variances as long as the <br />conditions are directly related and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the <br />variance. For instance, if a variance is granted to exceed the front setback limit, any conditions <br />attached should presumably relate to mitigating the effect of the encroachment. <br />3. Variance Requirements — Section 1355.04, Subd. 4 <br />The Applicants are requesting a front yard setback variance to demolition and reconstruct a single- <br />family dwelling on the property located at 1861 Highway 96 W. The Planning Commission will <br />need to make a determination utilizing the following variance findings and criteria on whether <br />there are practical difficulties with complying with the zoning regulations. If the applicants do not <br />meet all the factors of the statutory test, then a variance should not be granted. Variances are only <br />permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. <br />1. Purpose and Intent. The variance request shall comply with the purpose and intent of the <br />provisions of the City's Zoning Regulations and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />