My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-2001 PTRC Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes (1999 to Present)
>
1999-2009
>
2001
>
03-27-2001 PTRC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 6:39:47 AM
Creation date
12/29/2022 2:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03/15/1-001 14: 47 FAX 6514528940 MENDOTA HGTS MN 007 <br /> Dakota County(MN) Wetland Assessment, <br /> MonirorinJ, and Awareness project, <br /> • Revision 4,June 5, 1998 <br /> Page 12 of 50 <br /> For local government assessment and decision-making processes_ The project <br /> will explore if the citizen data can be used at the LGU decision-making level or if <br /> the LGU would need more technical assessment data for that purpose. <br /> By gathering data on both invertebrates and vegetation and comparing the scores, <br /> teams can identify Type I errors (where scores indicate that things are better than they <br /> really are) or Type II errors (where the scores indicate that things are worse than they <br /> .really are). If there are discrepancies that indicate Type I or Type II errors, teams <br /> should note the discrepancy and the data should be flagged for possible rejection. <br /> 7. .Most resource-efficient study design that will achieve an of the PD Os: The WHEp <br /> will follow the Mizuiesota Citizen Wetland Survey citizen protocol and the Technical <br /> Biotic Evaluation of Wetlands protocol designed by the MPCA and the quality assurance <br /> plan laid out in this QAPP. The project will utilize citizen groups, technical experts, and <br /> county and state agency staff. Technical experts will visit the same wetland sites as the <br /> citizen teams in the cities, and these duplicate visits will be the basis of the comparison, <br /> h is anticipated that the citizen volunteer methodology will prove to be a viable, <br /> economical means for local governments and others to assess local wetland health, <br /> See Appendix C for an overview and rationale of the Minnesota Citizen Wetland <br /> Invertebrate Metrics, Appendix D for the invertebrate sampling protocols, Appendix E <br /> for the invertebrate field data sheet, Appendix F for an overview of vegetation as a <br /> • biological indicator, Appendix G for the vegetation protocol sheet, Appendix H for the <br /> vegetation metric sheet, Appendix I for the vegetation field sheet, Appendix J for the site <br /> sketch Sheet, and Appendix K for the releve data sheet to be used by the technical <br /> experts. See Appendices L and M for the Technical Biotic Evaluation of Wetlands <br /> technical protocol. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.