Laserfiche WebLink
one cause of the hiehe_ Dredatior. rates S f:agmentec gram fc- the an-lysis c.` scvera: survival o- recovers• <br /> landscapes and along habitat edges. Technical ttpor-2-. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service.Laurel, <br /> While likely t0 De ConirOve Sia. t;.i; Dr, a: Hobbz, FL *.. and� :. rucnreKe. 199'_. D�sn roance.diverstn and <br /> sior:impucauon.s m-, conservation.Conservation Biology 6-324_ <br /> least appears feasible, and we hope our results will stun- 337 <br /> Hutchinson.. = anc Vankat. 1997. inva_sibilirr and efft <br /> Mate critical research in this are-• I; invasive. exotic Amur honeysuckle ir+ southwestern Oho forests. Cottservat <br /> shrubs are shown t0 incrt-ase nest DredaLlOn in other set- ology 11:111--i:::. <br /> zings. restoring native, fruio-producing shrub species James, F. C., C. E. McCulloch. and D. A. Wiedenfeid. 1996. New <br /> . <br /> could accompiish several conservation. goals simulta- proaches to the analyses of population-trendsin land b-27 irds. <br /> neoush• by enhancing native plan: species richness and ogy 7:1" <br /> Latta,S.C.,and M. E. Bait-. 1997.Population limitation in Neotta <br /> songbird nes: success, while concornitanth' maintaining migratory birds:comments on Rappoie and McDonald(1994) <br /> fruit resources necessary'for migrant fat deposition. 114:754-762. <br /> Luken,J. O..and J. I:'. Thieret. 1996.Amu:honeysuckle, its fall 1to� <br /> grace. BioSciencc <br /> Martin, T. E. 1998. Arc microhabitat preferences of coexisting bird <br /> aCl:nOwled�1r11eRts species under. seiection and adaptive?Ecology 79:656-670. <br /> Martin,T. E.,and J. R. Roper. 1988. Nest predation and nest-site seiec_ <br /> We thank: S. Dilger and others for their dedicated field lion of a western population of the Hermit Thrush.Condor 90:51-57.s <br /> htayficld, H. F. 19'5.Suggestions for calculating nest success.W <br /> work. We especially thank:S. Robinson, who urged us to t>smnI <br /> Bulletin 87:456-466. <br /> conduct the analysis. C. Jones. G. Levin. B. Molano- <br /> Mills,G.s.,J.B.Dunning g Jr.,and K.rat.Bate_ 1989.Effects of urbania. <br /> Flores, R. Ostfeid, ,li. Rudolph. and E. Ulazek com- tion on breeding bird community structure in southwestern dextc <br /> mented usefully on the manuscript. We are most grate- habitats. Condor 91:428-461. <br /> f111 to G. Ware and C. Dunn of The Morton Arboretum Rappoie,J. H.,and M. V. McDonald. 1994.Cause and cNect in poptda. <br /> for facilitating our research. This research Ryas sup slop declines of migratory birds.Auk 111:652-660. <br /> Robinson,S. K.,F.R.Thompson nI,T.M.Donovan,D.R.Whitehead, <br /> ported by a National Science Foundation Dissertation <br /> c R and J.Faaborg. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting <br /> ._.:W <br /> Improvement Grant(K.A.S.)and the Emily Rodgers Davis success of migratory birds.Science 267:1987-1990. <br /> Chair Endowment to The.Morton Arboretum(C.J.W.). Schmidt. K. A. 1999. Foraging theory as a conceptual framework for <br /> studying nest predation.Oikos 85:151-160. <br /> Schmidt,K.A.,and C.J.Whelan. 1998. Predator-mediated interactions <br /> Literature Cited between and within guilds of nesting songbirds:experimental and <br /> observational evidence.American Naturalist 152:393-402. <br /> Askins. R..A.,J.F.Lynch.and R.Greenberg. 1990. Population declines Trisel,D.E.,and D.L Gorchov. 1994.Regional distribution,ecological <br /> in migratory birds in eastern North America. Current Ornithology impact, and leaf phenology of the invasive shrub Lonicera <br /> 7.1-5 7. maackit: Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 75:231. <br /> Gates.J. E..and L W.Gyscl. 19-8.Avian nest dispersion and fledgling van Home, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat qual- <br /> success in field-forest ecotonm.Ecology 59:871-a83. iry.Journal of Wildlifc Management 47:893-901. <br /> Germaine,S.S.. S.S. Rosenstock. R. E. Schweinsberg,and W. S. Rich- Whelan, C. J., and M. L. Dilgcr. 1992. Invasive, exotic shrubs: a <br /> ands-on. 1998.Relationships among breeding birds,habitat,and res paradox for natural area managers? Natural Areas Journal 12:109- <br /> idential development in greater Tucson,Arizona. Ecological Appli- 110. <br /> cations 8:680-691. Whelan,C.J.,and M.L. Dilger. 1995.Exotic invasive shrubs:a paradox <br /> Hines,J. E.,and J.R. Sauer. 1989. Program CON-MA6.ST:a general pro- revisited.Natural Areas Journal 15.296. <br /> .,.qi All <br /> I'kiI�,1I 'ylS 1 <br />