My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-13-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2023 11:04:21 AM
Creation date
2/13/2023 10:57:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JANUARY 3, 2023 9 <br />build a first class, exceptional development. He commented further on how the affordable <br />housing would play into the financial models for the project. <br />Councilmember Holden encouraged each of the new Councilmembers to meet with Stacie <br />Kvilvang in order to better understand the financial models for the project. <br />Councilmember Monson suggested the Council hold a work session with Stacie Kvilvang. <br />Mayor Grant reported if this were done, all of the City's financial models would become public <br />record, which may make it more difficult for the City to negotiated with the County going <br />forward. <br />Councilmember Monson questioned if the Council could hold a closed meeting to review the <br />financials with Stacie Kvilvang. <br />Mayor Grant stated unfortunately this was not an option. He explained closed meetings were <br />reserved only for personnel matters, litigation matters and to negotiate the purchase of property. <br />He recommended the new Councilmembers meet with Ms. Kvilvang separately versus holding a <br />public meeting. <br />Councilmember Fabel commented on the previous structure that has been followed by the City <br />Council for the JDA, which was made up of two Councilmembers and one member of the public. <br />He stated the ultimate goal was for the JDA to come to an agreement with the County and this <br />agreement would have to be approved by the entire City Council. <br />Mayor Grant discussed how the process evolved over time for the JDA. He reported in the <br />beginning the City zoned the property and the County negotiated the price. <br />Councilmember Monson requested further information regarding the MDA. <br />City Attorney Jamnik explained the master development agreement would be executed between <br />the developer and the County and be primarily a land transfer. He stated the City and the County <br />would have a separate standalone cooperative agreement on the infrastructure financing. He <br />reported this path was chosen because the transaction was effected by the traunch phase <br />acquisition program for the real estate transaction. He noted separate from this was the spine road, <br />utility and water tower financing, which led to the decision to split these items out. He reported <br />the financing of the infrastructure was in flux, along with who would complete the work. <br />Councilmember Fabel spoke to the Rice Creek Commons Master Agreement Summary and the <br />Master Development Agreement from November 2018 and asked what the status was of these <br />documents. <br />City Administrator Perrault reported the PowerPoint in the Council orientation was from the <br />JDA meeting from September 4, 2018. He indicated this was the framework approved by the JDA <br />on a 3-2 vote and these were the most recent documents approved by the JDA. The master <br />development agreement from Alatus was considered execution ready by the developer, but it was <br />not approved by the County or the City. He explained litigation began shortly thereafter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.