My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-13-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2023 11:04:21 AM
Creation date
2/13/2023 10:57:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JANUARY 3, 2023 12 <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported he did not recall Bob Lux asking for 1900 units, but he did make <br />a request for additional density with a concrete high rise building. He noted the number then <br />evolved into 1460. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated the number was at 1200 and was brought up to 1460 for Bob <br />Lux because he wanted another building. <br />City Attorney Jamnik stated this was what he recalled, noting there was movement on the <br />density before the goals were adopted in December of 2015. <br />Mayor Grant explained his comments were regarding the May terms sheet, noting Bob Lux came <br />to the City and asked to move forward with 1460. <br />Councilmember Fabel stated he understood Mayor Grant and Councilmember Holden worked <br />very hard to move this project forward but it had stalled. He reported he ran a vigorous campaign <br />that would change direction and get this project done. He stated he would not be resuming the <br />stalled process but rather he would like to bring forward an agreement from the JDA which would <br />receive wide public support. He believed this was both the socially and fiscally responsible thing <br />to do. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she had an issue with the fact Councilmember Fabel believed this <br />project had not moved forward because it was all the City's fault. She indicated the City moved <br />through different proposals with the County and had begged the County to install Phase I to see <br />how traffic flows. She reported this project could have been built with 3,000 people living on <br />TCAAP, but the County said no. <br />Councilmember Fabel indicated he did not say that. He understood this project has been stuck <br />since 2018 and he would like this to become unstuck. He anticipated there was plenty of blame to <br />go around. <br />Mayor Grant stated he hoped the options for moving this project forward would come from the <br />City Council in concert with the residents of Arden Hills. <br />Councilmember Fabel reiterated that this process has been followed and the process has been <br />stuck since 2018. He stated this process would now move forward. <br />Councilmember Holden commented on the 36 JDA meetings that the County had failed to attend <br />in order to move this project forward. She questioned how this was the City's fault. <br />Mayor Grant stated there was a fundamental difference in where the negotiations would go. He <br />asked why the Council was not interested in having the residents a part of this process. <br />Councilmember Rousseau explained this was why she had asked if a work session could be held <br />with Stacie Kvilvang in order to bring the process to the people. She believed it would be <br />important for residents to learn as she learns. <br />Mayor Grant questioned how the Council would learn from the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.