My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-13-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2023 11:04:21 AM
Creation date
2/13/2023 10:57:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. We have since reduced the wall sign to approx. 68 SF. This is a reduction <br />of approx. 62%. The new sign design is approx..3% of the west building <br />elevation. <br />4. Per Sign District 4 ordinance, we are allowed to have up to 50SF of wall <br />signage in this district. We are requesting flexibility to allow for 18 <br />additional square feet. <br />5. This sign is slightly under the optimal building sign letter height per the <br />United States Sign Council guidance. We have reduced the size per the <br />comments and discussion at the December Planning Commission but <br />would like to maintain this minimum letter height in order to not <br />sacrifice legibility any further. <br />ii. Design <br />1. We have incorporated architectural and brand design changes to the <br />wall sign to enhance the overall view of the building and sign area. We <br />have done this by incorporating aspects of the other on site signage and <br />including the logo of New Perspective. <br />iii. Consider designing and utilizing a freestanding sign along Snelling Ave <br />1. Our team went through one more time and did an analysis of using a <br />freestanding or retaining wall sign on Snelling Ave. per the Planning <br />Commissions comment and found that this was not feasible. <br />Landscaping, guard rail, and fencing prohibited the use of the sign <br />adjacent to the property line in a visible area. Using the retaining wall <br />was not a feasible option as the engineer who designed the wall did not <br />recommend as the wall was not engineered for signage to be installed <br />to it. <br />Sincerely, <br />Florent Ilazi <br />Arden Hills RE, LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.