My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-13-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2023 11:04:21 AM
Creation date
2/13/2023 10:57:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JANUARY 3, 2023 14 <br />City Administrator Perrault explained the two items that would have to be dealt with should <br />remote meetings be allowed long-term is (1) having a staff member manage and monitor the <br />Zoom platform, and (2) we may need to purchase an additional camera to assist in meeting the <br />requirements for work sessions. He noted it was not overly burdensome for staff to manage this <br />aspect, and the camera likely wouldn't be too expensive, but both were in -addition to how <br />meetings were run today. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if this would apply to Councilmembers and work sessions. <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported this would apply to all City elected and appointed bodies, <br />including the City Council, Commissions and Committees. <br />Councilmember Fabel asked how the City defined a public space. <br />City Administrator Perrault explained this would be a publicly accessible space, such as a <br />library, and could not be a Council or Commission member's home. <br />City Attorney Jamnik noted that staff members and members of the public could attend <br />meetings from their home. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she could support the City moving forward with remote <br />meetings. In addition, she supported the City allowing the public to call in remotely for the Public <br />Comment Forum. <br />Mayor Grant explained this matter was brought forward by Susan Johnson and the previous <br />Council recommended this Council make a decision on how to proceed. <br />Councilmember Fabel questioned if the City could set limits on the number of members that <br />could attend remotely. <br />City Attorney Jamnik advised the City Council could set a procedure rule that facilitates remote <br />participation by less than four. He reported this would require notification that some members <br />would be attending remotely and where this location was prior to the meeting being held. <br />Mayor Grant commented he did not support the Council defining how many people could attend <br />meetings remotely. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked how difficult it would be to administer a meeting if public <br />comment was allowed to be taken remotely. <br />City Administrator Perrault stated this would not be too difficult, noting he or the City Clerk <br />would have to manage those who participate via Zoom. <br />Councilmember Rousseau suggested the City could have an advance line up for those that want <br />to speak via Zoom. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.