Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 3, 2023 8 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant provided further history on the TCAAP project noting the County had agreed to <br />the proposed density for the project in December of 2016. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau requested further information on how the JDA would function. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant explained the JDA was a legal entity of its own. He reported the JDA’s function <br />was to oversee the development of the TCAAP property and would act similar to a Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik advised the JDA allowed for joint action. He stated the City and the <br />County make up the joint development board. He indicated the Joint Powers Act was a <br />mechanism by which the JDA could be formed and the Joint Powers Agreement outlines the <br />authority conferred to the authority by the City and the County. He stated the JDA gets its own <br />insurance rather than being insured by the City or the County. He indicated this group could also <br />have its own attorney as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson questioned if the JDA could make its own decisions. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported the JDA can make the decisions the City and County specify it <br />can make. He noted other matters have to be referred back to the City for formal integration into <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant explained without the JDA, matters would be reviewed by the City because only <br />the City has zoning authority. He indicated the JDA was a way to share certain authority with the <br />County. He stated if the JDA were to reengage, the group would have to hire an attorney and <br />purchase insurance. He did not believe it would be onerous for either party to meet the <br />requirements within the JDA documents. It was his hope that both sides would work together to <br />make sure all requirements are being met. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson asked if there was anything on the City’s side that had to be done prior <br />to reengaging the JDA. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik noted the JDA was still in place and viable. He stated notice would have <br />to be made for hearings, but legally there was nothing impeding meetings starting up again. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant explained the County told the City to negotiate with Bob Lux. He stated the City <br />met with Bob Lux in order to come up with a plan that was acceptable to the City. He reported the <br />City did not previously meet with Bob Lux because he was the County’s buyer. However, after <br />the court proceedings were finished, the City was told to meet with Bob Lux. He anticipated the <br />first issue that would have to be addressed by the JDA was affordable housing. He indicated the <br />affordable housing aspect was one where the County would say no to the City. He stated it would <br />be good to figure this aspect of the development out first. He understood Bob Lux wanted to <br />build a first class, exceptional development. He commented further on how the affordable <br />housing would play into the financial models for the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden encouraged each of the new Councilmembers to meet with Stacie <br />Kvilvang in order to better understand the financial models for the project. <br />