My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-09-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
01-09-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2023 2:04:56 PM
Creation date
2/14/2023 2:04:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JANUARY 9, 2023 9 <br /> <br />of discord. He understood governing and leadership were difficult. He urged the Councilmembers <br />to balance their own personal interests with what they know is right. He stated silencing an <br />official that was elected by the majority of the voters was not right. He believed all of the Council <br />understood this, but he questioned if the Council had the integrity to do what they knew was right. <br /> <br />Mark Kelliher, 3712 Chatham Court, stated he has lived in Arden Hills for the past 30 years. He <br />noted he was a member of the Parks and Trails Commission. He explained he was in attendance <br />to see the swearing in ceremony and get an idea of what the next steps were for the Council. He <br />has since learned that Councilmember Fabel has sent out a memo calling for a cabal, which was <br />defined as contrived schemes of a group of persons secretly united in a plot to overturn a <br />government. He stated Mayor Grant was the Mayor. He indicated Councilmember Fabel was <br />guilty of causing a commotion and noted his memo was absolutely disruptive. He explained he <br />tried to get to know the new Councilmembers prior to the election and what they were going to do <br />for the residents of Arden Hills. He wanted to see TCAAP developed, but wanted to see this done <br />properly. He feared the County has been remiss in its duties. He hoped that by electing some new <br />members, this project would move forward. He indicated he tried to learn from the Advance <br />Arden Hills what their answer was regarding density and has yet to understand their goal or <br />purpose. He stated he has since learned that Councilmember Fabel was bypassing the spirit of the <br />open meeting law and that he has a cabal in place. He expressed frustration with the fact these <br />three new members were working to remove Mayor Grant’s power. He discussed how sour grapes <br />in elections doesn’t do anybody any good. He stated he was shocked by the behavior of <br />Councilmember Fabel and how complicit the Councilmembers were behaving. He reported he <br />was so disappointed the new Councilmembers would be place for the next four years representing <br />Arden Hills when they were not open with their true thoughts, intentions or motives. He asked <br />that the new Councilmembers publish their intentions in order to make the public aware of their <br />plan. He reiterated again, that he was so disappointed in Councilmember Fabel’s actions. He <br />recommended Councilmember Fabel remove his ideas from consideration. He recommended <br />instead that the Council work together for the betterment of the community and not just based on <br />the thoughts of the three new Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Lisa Holzemer, 3531 Ridgewood Court, stated she thought this meeting would go very different. <br />She read part of Tom’s memo because she believed there was a misunderstanding. She read the <br />proposed motions one through seven aloud for the record. It was her understanding this memo <br />was given to the Mayor and Councilmember Holden prior to this meeting to give them a heads up, <br />and it was not a hostile takeover. She explained she appreciated the new Councilmembers and she <br />hoped they would be able to do great things to move Arden Hills forward. <br /> <br />Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, reported she was displeased that the previous Councilmembers <br />tried to railroad appointments before the elected Council took office. She was glad the new <br />members were taking initiative and were being active. She believed the City needed new faces and <br />ideas on the JDA. She indicated her son was a planner and he discussed how sunk cost and <br />cognitive bias were impacting the JDA and TCAAP development. She stated it may be best for <br />personal attachments to be dropped from the project. She commented the inflexible attitudes of <br />previous members and their troubled relationships with the County were not working. She <br />supported the City appointing new members to the JDA for a fresh start. She discussed what <br />projection bias was and noted how it interferes with imagining a new future. She commented on <br />how housing and work needs have changed since 2016. She supported new members working on
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.