My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-21-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:07:40 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:59:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />North Heights Church Apartments <br />Proposed Project Presented — Market Rate Standard Apartments (not age restricted senior living) <br />7/29/2021 Neighborhood Meeting — Public Comments <br />Comment Card #1: <br />o "1 do not want to see this. There is plenty of development about to happen at TCAAP and the traffic flow + noise <br />from Hwy 10 and deforestation is about to be a nightmare in this area. I am not convinced that this will be <br />anything other than low income with greedy Ramsey County in the mix. Wait a few years when this property <br />degrades and people see the problems with living here! Also Hwy 96 is dangerous as -is at these intersections and <br />adding these residents won't help! The last thing I want is more danger or some terrible Idea like a round -about. <br />Another signal would see equal if not great accident rates to Lexington's Hwy 96 intersection. NO THANK YOU! <br />Will not support. Also, WE DO NOT WANT Public Transit in this area!" <br />• Comment Card #2: <br />o "1 do not know why I was not notified of this meeting when I would be directly affected by this (Colleen Ct). <br />Residents across the highway were notified. So this public meeting seems to be directed at those that may be less <br />affected. TCAP seems like enough development. Quality of life, property values, crime levels —very concerned <br />about how this would be affect by this apartment complex." <br />• Comment Card #3: <br />o "No apartments — would prefer townhomes. Traffic issues!" <br />• Developer's anecdotal summary/interpretation of verbal feedback received is outlined below. <br />These are not direct and/or written quotes. These notes may unintentionally include errors or interpretations by the <br />developer that are different than what was intended by the person(s) verbalizing comments. <br />o Traffic <br />■ There are concerns about apartment residents utilizing/going-through the church parking lot to enter/exit <br />on the east side of the church site —to Snelling. This was a major and consistent concern. <br />■ Market apartments, w/kids, will result in extra traffic to Royal Park; and the current infrastructure <br />(pedestrian connections, park equipment, park vehicular parking) doesn't have capacity to handle and <br />isn't safe. This was a major and consistent concern. <br />■ Will result in extra traffic through neighborhood to the east (rather than using Hwy 96); and the current <br />infrastructure doesn't have capacity to handle. This would be for apt residents trying to go towards St. <br />Paul/694 E. Additionally, the current condition of this infrastructure is a concern. This was a major and <br />consistent concern. <br />■ There are existing concerns about traffic along old Highway 10; and that this project won't help and could <br />potentially have a negative effect. Additionally, the condition of nearby road infrastructure is a concern. <br />o Sound <br />■ This site may not work for apts due to the noise from the adjacent Highways. <br />■ A sound wall will be constructed along Highway 10 in the future; residents of the apartment will not <br />desire the new wall. <br />■ Noise along Old Highway 10 a major concern currently. <br />■ What sound mitigation will occur for this apartment? <br />o This project will decrease the value of all the homes in the neighborhood to the east. <br />o Why doesn't the developer construction senior living age restricted apartments —rather than standard market <br />apartments that will have families with kids? <br />o Why not construct condos? <br />o Why not construct town homes? <br />o What is the current zoning? <br />o No low-income housing desired. <br />NOTE: the Developer generally observed about 25-30 residents in attendance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.