My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-23-PC Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2023
>
03-08-23-PC Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2023 12:01:04 PM
Creation date
3/2/2023 12:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 9 of 14 <br />those two setbacks is 63.15 feet. The Applicant has shown on both site plans a proposed setback <br />from OHW of 53.2 feet after subtracting the 10 additional feet. Planning staff has discussed with <br />the Applicant that in this scenario the placement of the new homes would not be entitled to <br />minus the 10 feet due to condition B (as shown above) that no new structure can be nearer to <br />OHW than the nearest adjacent dwelling. In this case, the property to the south is setback at 59.7 <br />feet which is further from OHW than the proposed 53.2 feet. Since a new dwelling cannot be <br />nearer to OHW than the nearest adjacent dwelling, the minimum setback to OHW for the <br />proposed Minor Subdivision becomes 59.7 feet. <br /> <br />Planning Staff has requested from the Applicant that he verify the setback from OHW for the <br />adjacent property to the south. From Ramsey County GIS it appears that the distance shown on <br />the site plans submitted is measured from a detached accessory structure. The calculation for <br />adjacent lot setbacks shall be from the adjacent dwelling, not an accessory structure. The <br />Applicant has confirmed it is not their intent to seek a variance from any of the requirements as <br />outlined in the Shoreland Regulations. As a recommended condition of approval, the Applicant <br />shall be required to comply with all applicable provisions of Section 1330, Shoreland <br />Regulations and to submit an updated certificate of survey in satisfaction of these requirements <br />prior to issuance of a building permit. By addressing this planning comment via a condition, the <br />Applicant can continue through the Minor Subdivision review without modifying all of the <br />survey documents at this time. Any future building permit application for the new home <br />construction would be subject to compliance with this provision and staff would verify this <br />provision has been satisfied as part of the permitting process. <br /> <br />Plan Evaluation Summary <br /> <br />The table below provides the minimum district requirements for the R-2 District and Shoreland <br />regulations along with a preliminary analysis for the proposed development: <br /> <br /> R-2 District <br />Standards <br />Shoreland <br />Overlay District Parcel A <br /> <br />Parcel B <br />Minimum Lot Area 11,000 square feet 14,000 square feet 30,918 square feet 30,687 square feet <br />Minimum Lot Width <br />85 feet measured at <br />public roadway <br />75 feet measured at <br />OHW setback <br />169.46 feet – street, <br />192.73 feet - OHW <br />60 feet – street*, <br />155.09 feet - OHW <br />Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet N/A 103.15 feet* 207.88 feet <br />Minimum Front Yard <br />Setback 40 feet <br /> <br />40 feet 40 feet <br /> <br />40 feet <br />Minimum Rear Yard <br />Setback 30 feet <br /> <br />N/A 5 feet* <br /> <br />5 feet* <br />Minimum Side Yard <br />Setback <br />5 feet (min)/15 feet <br />(total) <br />50 feet from OHW <br />(west) & Adjacent <br />Lots 53.2 feet/40 feet <br /> <br /> <br />53.2 feet/40 feet <br />*Variance requested by Applicant. <br /> <br />4. Variance Review <br /> <br />The role of the Planning Commission is to determine and consider how the facts presented to them <br />compare with the city’s articulated standards. The Commission should base their decision on the <br />facts presented and then apply those facts to the legal standards contained in city ordinances and <br />relevant state law. Neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for granting or denying a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.