My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-23-PC Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2023
>
03-08-23-PC Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2023 12:01:04 PM
Creation date
3/2/2023 12:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 7, 2022 4 <br /> <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund asked who owned the land along the rear property line. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated this land was owned by US Fish and Wildlife <br />Services. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund questioned vehicles were being parked on the neighbor’s property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe deferred this question to the applicant. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums commented the right of way has been reduced over time because of the expansion <br />of Highway 96, which was an unfair constraint on this property. He inquired if the architect <br />considered moving the new structure a little closer to the lakefront in order to satisfy City Code. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained the applicant had considered other <br />possible locations on the property, but after trying to save as many significant trees as possible, <br />the proposed house placement was presented to staff. <br /> <br />Katie Bach, 1861 Highway 96 West, reported she went through a number of different iterations <br />with her architect when considering the placement of the house and garage on this lot. She <br />discussed how the ordinary highwater setback was set based on her neighbors setback. She noted <br />the placement and angle of the garage was difficult, due to the location of mature oaks and <br />maples. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums questioned if the house could be shifted south or southwest. <br /> <br />Ms. Bach stated if the house was pushed south, this would cause concern with the ordinary <br />highwater setback relative to the neighbors setback and to the west there was a mature maple she <br />was trying to save. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums indicated this was a non-conforming lot that has been eroded by Highway 96 <br />easements and encroachments, which made it difficult to place a home. He was of the opinion the <br />proposed home was well placed on the lot and noted only a small portion of the garage was <br />encroaching within the setbacks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund moved and Commissioner Collins seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 22-022 for a Variance at 1861 Highway 96 West <br />based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, a s amended by the conditions in the <br />December 7, 2022, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously <br />(6-0). <br /> <br />B. Planning Case 22-023; 3565 Pine Tree Drive – PUD Amendment – Public Hearing <br />Required <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.