Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — FEBRUARY 13, 2023 6 <br />Steve Scott, 4286 Norma Avenue, discussed the proposed Ordinance change. He stated there was <br />no confusion regarding the status of the City and noted the vast majority of the cities in Minnesota <br />were organized in the same manner as Arden Hills. He explained the Mayor was elected to a four <br />year term and was only allowed one vote, no more or less than any other member of the City <br />Council. He indicated the only confusion was why the new Councilmembers were doing this. He <br />stated current City Code allows the Mayor to solicit individual Council preferences for liaison <br />positions with the final approval coming from a vote of the entire City Council. He discussed how <br />Shoreview manages their appointments. He encouraged the new Councilmembers to act in a <br />manner that does not further divide the Council. He expressed concern with a comment from <br />Councilmember Fabel regarding something he was told about the City's mediation effort with the <br />County. He reiterated the fact that the City was willing to move to alternative levels of housing <br />noting the County rejected the compromise. He encouraged the new Councilmembers to stop <br />operating under "the big lie". He discussed how the new Councilmembers would be learning in <br />their new role and noted parking would have to be considered if the proposed density within <br />TCAAP were doubled. <br />Steve Erler, 1704 Chatham Avenue, reported several speakers at the January Council meeting <br />encouraged the newly elected Councilmembers to be more cooperative with Mayor Grant and <br />Councilmember Holden. He stated cooperation only works when all parties are involved. He <br />discussed how the actions of the previous Council, in December, could be viewed as uncooperative. <br />He indicated these actions could be viewed by the incoming Councilmembers as an attempt to deny <br />the incoming Council the opportunity to make those appointments. He stated he was not surprised <br />the new Council changed the appointment process. He reported Councilmember Holden's behavior <br />at the January 9 meeting was unbecoming of a City leader. He feared the cooperation that the public <br />was calling for was one-sided and was only meant for the newly elected Councilmembers. He stated <br />this was not cooperation but rather was capitulation. He understood some residents were not <br />pleased with the results of the election. He indicated the residents of Arden Hills clearly voted for <br />change by replacing three of the four incumbents. He noted the Mayor barely won reelection. He <br />believed it was time for Mayor Grant and Councilmember Holden to adopt a spirit of cooperation <br />and to find a way to govern the City with the newly elected Councilmembers. <br />Mary Henry, 3521 Ridgewood Court, stated during the last Council meeting she heard <br />Councilmember Holden express concern that the Arden Hills Council could become more like the <br />Maplewood City Council. She encouraged this Council to listen openly and to hear what the other <br />Councilmembers are saying, as well as the residents. She suggested the Council also be willing to <br />ask the public what they want. She urged the Council to work to trust that each Councilmember <br />wants the best for Arden Hills. She strongly recommended the Council treat each other as <br />individuals and not as groups. <br />Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, stated honesty and trust were important in any relationship. She <br />explained she spoke to Mayor Grant years ago about including affordable housing within TCAAP <br />and she was told this was not economically feasible. She noted after the law suit was over she asked <br />what the plan was for Rice Creek Commons and she was told this could not legally be discussed. <br />She stated she asked the Mayor if the developer had included any affordable units in the new senior <br />development she was told this could not be done. She reported all of these statements were untrue. <br />She reported in 2003 when the City redid her road the City asked for and received permission to <br />install a retention pond on her neighbor's property. This retention pond was to be maintained and <br />inspected by the City on a yearly basis and this has not been done. She stated once the Advance <br />Arden Hills candidates filed for office, all of the sudden the City shows up, along with the Mayor <br />stating they would take care of it, as was promised 20 years ago. She discussed how a comment <br />