My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-05-23-PC Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2023
>
04-05-23-PC Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2023 8:54:01 AM
Creation date
3/31/2023 8:52:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – March 8, 2023 6 <br /> <br />Chair Vijums commented further on how the houses would be oriented and noted the houses <br />would not look into each other even if they were only 10 feet apart. He explained he owned a <br />house in St. Paul and it was less than 10 feet from the neighbors. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he understood this was common in other communities. He <br />indicated he would still like more information regarding the buildability of the lot to the east <br />because this would impact the two proposed homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mitchell discussed the length and width for the lot to the east noting it appeared <br />to be buildable. She commented on how the home on Tract B would have a view of the road, <br />while the home on Tract A would not. She commented on how the future homeowner on Tract A <br />could plant trees or shrubs to screen their view. She noted the widths of the lot were not <br />substantially different than the neighboring lots and the two homes would have a shared <br />driveway. She believed this was a better use of the land than having one huge house on the <br />property. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. <br /> <br />Mike Mezzenga, property owner and applicant, explained the equipment on the site was recently <br />placed onsite to clear the snow from the parking lot. He commented further on how the lots <br />would be oriented and reviewed house plans that would work on each of the tracts. He discussed <br />how the future homes may not be as large as he was proposing, which meant the setbacks <br />between the houses would be larger. He explained he was not intending to go any closer to the <br />lake than the OHW setback. <br /> <br />Roland Cargalatti, 1137 Edgewater Avenue, explained he received notice of the proposed <br />subdivision. He stated the project was lacking an easement. He discussed how the homes along <br />Edgewater Avenue had deeded lake access to Lake Josephine. He reported after speaking with <br />his neighbors, they confirmed the same information. He then reviewed the language within his <br />abstract regarding the deeded lake access. He requested this easement be included in City <br />documents and be taken into consideration. He noted the neighbors use this easement to access <br />the lake. <br /> <br />There being no additional comment Chair Vijums closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe requested Mr. Cargalatti provide her with <br />information regarding the deeded lake access noting she would investigate this matter further. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums asked how the Commission wanted to proceed with this Planning Case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber asked if the Commission could make a recommendation for approval, <br />with adjustments to the side yard setbacks. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated the Commission could make a <br />recommendation to the Council to adjust the side yard setbacks in order to bring about more <br />separation between the two homes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.