Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment C <br />Mike Mezzenga <br />1489 Bussard Court <br />Arden Hills, Mn 55112 <br />mikemezzenga@gmail.com <br />651-402-3377 2-9-23 <br />Dear Members of the Arden Hills City Planning Commission, <br />My name is Mike Mezzenga owner of 1174 Edgewater Avenue. <br />The property at 1174 Edgewater Avenue was used as a clubhouse. The intended use <br />was commercial, and had a parking lot to accommodate dozens of cars. <br />The hardship is changing this property over from a commercial use to a residential use. <br />My intention is to make 2 residential lots out of this land. This parcel of land is more <br />than big enough to accommodate 2 lots. The size of the lots would be almost 3/4 of an <br />acre each. <br />The property can't be put to a reasonable residential use because its only access point <br />is on one side, Edgewater Avenue, which limits it to one lot. I don't think anybody in the <br />neighborhood wants to see any kind of commercial development built here. <br />This property is unique because it was originally intended as a large gathering hall for <br />the ODD Fellows Club, which needed lots of parking for meetings and only one access <br />point from Edgewater Avenue. <br />The only deviation from the ordinance is to create 2 access points off of Edgewater <br />Avenue. One of which would be 60 feet, which is 20 feet less than minimum width. This <br />is just an access point however, that leads to the front yard of Tract B. It will meet all <br />requirements to city ordinances. Front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks. The <br />narrower street width access could be looked at as a type of cu-de-sac entrance, where <br />it just narrows at the street and widens out from there. <br />This variance will not create a land use not permitted in this zone. <br />This variance is not for economic reasons alone. The tract is large enough to put more <br />density on it than I am proposing. I simply want to construct 2 single family, upscale <br />homes that would have large yards and plenty of privacy, and would still mesh with <br />surrounding homes. <br />Tract A, because the rear yard is being described as opposite the front yard in city <br />ordinances, I am asking for a rear yard setback variance. The house will run parallel to <br />Edgewater Avenue, and the rear yard would be actually facing the lake. So opposite <br />the front yard will in fact be a side yard. I am still meeting the front yard setback <br />requirement from the street and the Tract B access. <br />