Laserfiche WebLink
X <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Page 10 of 63 <br />October 7, 2022 <br />  <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Also, the portion of the proposed trail remaining to be constructed is located within three hundred <br />feet of a waterbody and its construction would disturb more than an acre of land, both of which <br />trigger the need for an RCWD Erosion and Sediment Control permit for this project. <br />Based on the anticipated area of additional impervious surfacing and disturbed area during <br />construction, construction of the remaining portion of the proposed trail will require the project to <br />meet MPCA permitting requirements. RCWD requirements are separate from MPCA requirements <br />and applicable requirements for both agencies will need to be met, however there are some design <br />elements and construction practices that will meet some of the requirements for both agencies. <br />Vegetated buffer strips will be needed for a majority of the project where the construction of <br />infiltration basins or wet ponds is not feasible. The costs for constructing infiltration basins or wet <br />ponds are not included in this report since the areas that are feasible for their construction will not <br />be identified until the field survey information is available during the final design phase of the <br />project. <br />Any wetland in the proximity of the trail area will need to be delineated, and any impacts will need <br />to be mitigated in accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act. Based on the National Wetland <br />Inventory layer at the RCWD MapViewer online, it was determined that there are some wetlands <br />in the project vicinity. These are shown in Figure 3 in Appendix A at their approximate locations. <br />If any portion of a delineated wetland will be disturbed or filled in, an RCWD Wetland Permit would <br />be needed. The costs for wetland mitigation are not included in this report. <br />It not anticipated that any construction will occur outside of the current street right-of-way. <br />A brief mention of the Interstate 694 crossing is warranted here. Old Snelling Ave. / Old Highway <br />10 passes beneath the eastbound and westbound bridges for Interstate 694 for a length of about <br />150 feet. Over this length, it is an urban section with concrete curb and asphalt paving between <br />the back of curb and the toe of concrete slope protection beneath and between the bridges, on <br />both sides of the roadway. This asphalt paving appears to be wide and flat enough to serve as the <br />surfacing for the proposed trail over this length. However, the dimensions and conditions should <br />be checked during the final design phase of the project to confirm its suitability for reuse as part of <br />the proposed trail, and the quantitative information in this updated report does not include an <br />exception for this portion of the proposed trail. <br />A point regarding impacts to the roadway culverts and entrance culverts along the proposed trail is <br />warranted here. It appears that about half of the entrances along the proposed trail corridor (along <br />the west side of Old Snelling Ave. / Old Highway 10) have drainage culverts beneath them, at <br />various offsets from the edge of the roadway. The transverse location of the proposed trail within <br />the right-of-way at these locations will determine the extent of the impacts to these culverts and <br />whether they need to be extended or relocated. For the purposes of this study, it was assumed <br />that an entrance culvert located where the proposed trail transverse location recommendation is <br />“Constrained” will not be impacted, and an entrance culvert located where the proposed trail <br />transverse location recommendation is “Preferred” will be impacted and need to be relocated. <br />These are noted with callouts in Figure 3 in Appendix A. The original report also noted the presence <br />of a 4’x5’ box culvert across Old Snelling Ave. / Old Highway 10 just south of Valentine Ave. and <br />stated that it will need to be extended. The presence and condition of this box culvert was unable <br />to be verified with this updated study, therefore the assumption is being made that the extension of <br />box culvert is still required. The locations and conditions of all drainage features along the proposed <br />trail corridor should be determined early in the final design phase of the project to properly evaluate <br />impacts and account for them with the final design.