My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
05-08-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2023 3:13:27 PM
Creation date
5/5/2023 3:10:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 10, 2023 11 <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the distance would be between the two houses. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe estimated the distance between the two homes would <br />be 20 feet. <br />Mayor Grant reviewed the front and rear yard setbacks for the lots. He asked if the front yard <br />was facing the lake. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe described how City ordinance defines lots and noted <br />the rear yard for these two lots was the south property line, parallel with the road. <br />Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. <br />Airika Coblentz, 3187 Lexington Avenue, requested the Council deny the variance request and <br />reorientation of the property. She recommended Site Plan A be followed and not Site Plan B. She <br />reported Site Plan B would create houses that are twice the size of the neighboring homes, which <br />would not be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. She discussed how these homes <br />would not be consistent and would adversely impact the shoreline. She explained with big houses, <br />comes big docks, big boats and disturbances along the shoreline. She questioned why Site Plan A <br />was not moving forward. <br />Sarah Albano, 3123 Shoreline Lane, stated she had many of the same concerns as Erica. She <br />reported the size of the proposed homes was not in keeping with the neighboring properties. She <br />explained she lives in an older home and she feared if this variance were allowed, the smaller <br />homes on the lake would be torn down and replaced with large homes that were five feet apart. <br />She urged the Council to not approve this variance as it would set a dangerous precedent. <br />Mike Mezzenga, the applicant, explained he designated areas for building pads and reported no <br />set house size had been determined for either of the two lots. He explained the new homes would <br />be no larger than half the houses on the lake. He discussed how impervious surface requirements <br />would determine the size of the homes on these lots. He stated he could support a change to the <br />proposed setbacks, but asked why his project was being singled out. He reviewed an aerial photo <br />of the lake and commented on the size and orientation of the neighboring homes. <br />Airika Coblentz commented on how the applicant's property was unique because the road <br />serving the two new lots ran perpendicular to the lake instead of being parallel to the lake. She <br />reiterated that the footprints for the proposed lots were out of line with any other homes in the <br />area. She noted the homes to the south were approximately 3,000 square feet in size and the <br />homes to the north were 3,200 square feet in size. She indicated the two new homes would be <br />quite a bit larger than this. She recommended Site Plan A be followed as this would allow for <br />smaller homes and would not require the setbacks to be changed. She reported she would like the <br />new homes to keep in character with the neighborhood. <br />Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 9:04 p.m. <br />10. NEW BUSINESS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.