My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
05-08-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2023 3:13:27 PM
Creation date
5/5/2023 3:10:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 10, 2023 <br />18 <br />Councilmember Fabel explained he supported the variance and minor subdivision. He thanked <br />the Planning Commission for their careful consideration of the request. He did not support the <br />City putting different requirements on this property. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Fabel moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br />motion to adopt Resolution #2023-017 for a Minor Subdivision and Variance <br />as submitted by the applicant in Site Plan B for the property located at 1174 <br />Edgewater Avenue, based on the findinLs of fact and submitted plans, as <br />amended by the conditions in the April 10, 2023 report to the City Council. <br />Councilmember Holden requested an amendment to the motion addition Condition 21 to read: <br />The south side yard setback on Tract B shall be 10 feet. <br />AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded <br />an amendment to add Condition 21 to read: The south side yard <br />setback on Tract B shall be 10 feet. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she appreciated the discussion and recommendations from the <br />Planning Commission but noted she supported the south property line being increased to 10 feet. <br />The amendment carried 4-1 (Councilmember Fabel opposed). <br />Councilmember Monson explained this was a very difficult decision for her to make. She <br />appreciated the fact the developer came forward with two single family homes, versus four <br />townhomes. She supported the Council reviewing City Code in order to reduce the number of <br />variances that came forward in the future. <br />Councilmember Holden discussed the existing setbacks in the neighborhood. She commented <br />she would not be able to support this request as she felt the setbacks were not appropriate. <br />The amended motion carried 4-1 (Councilmember Holden opposed). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.